Talk:The Living Bible: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I think this article is highly lacking in balance. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.20.46.127|24.20.46.127]] ([[User talk:24.20.46.127|talk]]) 11:55, 8 February 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
I think this article is highly lacking in balance. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.20.46.127|24.20.46.127]] ([[User talk:24.20.46.127|talk]]) 11:55, 8 February 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:That's a self published website. Drawing criticism from it is questionable. No printed work is <i>universally accepted</i> so I don't see how that criticism is even warranted. [[User:Basileias|Basileias]] ([[User talk:Basileias|talk]]) 14:38, 8 February 2011 (UTC) |
:That's a self published website. Drawing criticism from it is questionable. No printed work is <i>universally accepted</i> so I don't see how that criticism is even warranted. [[User:Basileias|Basileias]] ([[User talk:Basileias|talk]]) 14:38, 8 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
Well it's a translation of the Bible by someone who didn't have much Hebrew or Greek, and more importantly is accused of very heavy Arminian bias. |
Revision as of 10:00, 15 July 2013
Bible B‑class | ||||||||||
|
Christianity B‑class | ||||||||||
|
Criticism Section?
The living Bible was not universally accepted, and was widely criticized by many people. Here's just one viewpoint: http://www.bible-researcher.com/lbp.html
I think this article is highly lacking in balance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.46.127 (talk) 11:55, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- That's a self published website. Drawing criticism from it is questionable. No printed work is universally accepted so I don't see how that criticism is even warranted. Basileias (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Well it's a translation of the Bible by someone who didn't have much Hebrew or Greek, and more importantly is accused of very heavy Arminian bias.