User talk:Qataq: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Rivertorch (talk | contribs) →July 2013: n.b. |
←Blanked the page |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== July 2013 == |
|||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Editing comments|delete or edit]] legitimate talk page comments, as you did at [[:Talk:Of Mice and Men]]. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-tpv2 --> <span style="font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;color:#000;">[[User:Begoon|<span style="color:#0645AD;">Begoon</span>]] [[User talk:Begoon|<span style="color:gray;"><sup>talk</sup></span>]]</span> 07:20, 17 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please review both [[WP:TPO|the relevant guideline on talk page etiquette]] and [[WP:VAND|the policy on vandalism]]. Your repeated removals are contrary to accepted practice and are disruptive, and your two most recent edit summaries—[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Of_Mice_and_Men&diff=564713154&oldid=564713014], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Of_Mice_and_Men&diff=564713014&oldid=564621341]—indicate that your awareness of these community standards is lacking. We all see talk page comments we don't like, but there is consensus that they should be removed only under exceptional circumstances. When in doubt, I leave them be, and that happens almost daily. In any event, your removals have been reverted by three different editors now, which ought to tell you something. I hope you won't turn this into an edit war. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch|talk]]) 05:36, 18 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||