User talk:31.209.16.177: Difference between revisions
Mildly Mad (talk | contribs) |
Mildly Mad (talk | contribs) →Please calm down: elaaborate |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
Everyone who is a victim of censorship will have trouble getting their points across... [[Special:Contributions/31.209.16.177|31.209.16.177]] ([[User talk:31.209.16.177#top|talk]]) 19:47, 19 July 2013 (UTC) |
Everyone who is a victim of censorship will have trouble getting their points across... [[Special:Contributions/31.209.16.177|31.209.16.177]] ([[User talk:31.209.16.177#top|talk]]) 19:47, 19 July 2013 (UTC) |
||
:That's exactly |
:That's exactly the type of behavior I'm referring to... I don't think they're censoring you, they just don't like being called names. Instead of acting like a victim, try to work with them in a more respectful way. [[User:Mildly Mad|Mildly Mad]]<sup>[[User talk:Mildly Mad|T]]</sup><sub>[[Special:contributions/Mildly_Mad|C]]</sub> 19:50, 19 July 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:59, 19 July 2013
July 2013
Hello, I'm VQuakr. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:VQuakr that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 23:05, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Then dont remove my posts for no reason! its just that simple! censorship should never be tolerated 31.209.16.177 (talk) 23:08, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 23:58, 7 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
VQuakr (talk) 23:58, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Talk:Moon landing conspiracy theories. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 01:28, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Civility
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Moon_landing_conspiracy_theories. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 02:28, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Where is the attack?! TELL ME! - if you gonna accuse me you better bring up or shutup! and btw tell someone who care because i dont, i have no tolerance for a person without knowledge who interfering in the subject, i have better things to do than to explain for the person every single test they did in the mythbusters moon hoax episode 31.209.16.177 (talk) 10:08, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Talk:Moon landing conspiracy theories, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. VQuakr (talk) 16:48, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. INeverCry 19:28, 8 July 2013 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Talk:Moon landing conspiracy theories. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. WegianWarrior (talk) 13:10, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.Canterbury Tail talk 13:43, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
WHAT ATTACK? i demanded answers since i was accused for making "disruptive editing" 31.209.16.177 (talk) 14:29, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
- No I warned you for calling other editors propagandists (this edit.) Asking for answers and reasons is perfectly fine. Asking for references to be verified, reliable sources etc is completely acceptible. Calling others propagandists because they don't see your perspective isn't. Canterbury Tail talk 16:30, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Please calm down
Hi there 31, I noticed you were having trouble getting your points across at Talk:Moon landing conspiracy theories. I believe some of your points may be valid, but I think you're going to have a very hard time convincing other people of your position if you keep calling them liars and propagandists and accusing them of censorship. I think this was the reason some of your posts were removed--people don't like being called names. I think you would have a lot more success if you were to calmly explain your views and back it up with some links to sources that back up your position--just trying to explain why a source is wrong probably won't be good enough. I think you have the potential to become a great editor for Wikipedia, you just need to tone it down a couple of notches :-) Thanks, Mildly MadTC 19:41, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Everyone who is a victim of censorship will have trouble getting their points across... 31.209.16.177 (talk) 19:47, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
- That's exactly the type of behavior I'm referring to... I don't think they're censoring you, they just don't like being called names. Instead of acting like a victim, try to work with them in a more respectful way. Mildly MadTC 19:50, 19 July 2013 (UTC)