Jump to content

Talk:Evacuate Earth: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


This stub has some serious issues...the author/creator is reading a lot into this article without substantial citations or context, and speaking of context, the article itself is little more than a frame, and a poorly written one at that. If it can't be substantially improved, I'm voting for its removal as it conveys little informative value. [[Special:Contributions/66.103.112.145|66.103.112.145]] ([[User talk:66.103.112.145|talk]]) 02:21, 25 July 2013 (UTC).--[[Special:Contributions/66.103.112.145|66.103.112.145]] ([[User talk:66.103.112.145|talk]]) 02:21, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
This stub has some serious issues...the author/creator is reading a lot into this article without substantial citations or context, and speaking of context, the article itself is little more than a frame, and a poorly written one at that. If it can't be substantially improved, I'm voting for its removal as it conveys little informative value. [[Special:Contributions/66.103.112.145|66.103.112.145]] ([[User talk:66.103.112.145|talk]]) 02:21, 25 July 2013 (UTC).--[[Special:Contributions/66.103.112.145|66.103.112.145]] ([[User talk:66.103.112.145|talk]]) 02:21, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

== DAFUQ what is happening to this article!? ==

This has the most subjective content ever in the history of Wikipedia [[Special:Contributions/140.0.229.26|140.0.229.26]] ([[User talk:140.0.229.26|talk]]) 13:09, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:09, 29 July 2013

WikiProject iconTelevision Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

This stub has some serious issues...the author/creator is reading a lot into this article without substantial citations or context, and speaking of context, the article itself is little more than a frame, and a poorly written one at that. If it can't be substantially improved, I'm voting for its removal as it conveys little informative value. 66.103.112.145 (talk) 02:21, 25 July 2013 (UTC).--66.103.112.145 (talk) 02:21, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DAFUQ what is happening to this article!?

This has the most subjective content ever in the history of Wikipedia 140.0.229.26 (talk) 13:09, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]