Talk:1998 Tour de France: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Doping== |
==Doping== |
||
The main bulk of the coverage of the EPO-retests should be in an separate article, like there is an separate article about the [[Festina affair]], or maybe there should be an article called Doping the the 1998 Tour de France, but |
The main bulk of the coverage of the EPO-retests should be in an separate article, like there is an separate article about the [[Festina affair]], and/or maybe there should be an article called Doping the the 1998 Tour de France, but to have so much about the retests (which were quite random, as so few were tested, and so many tests missing/ruined in 2004) and so little about the Festina affair, which showed that basically the whole peloton was on everything they could get hold of in 1998, makes the article skewed. --[[Special:Contributions/176.11.193.193|176.11.193.193]] ([[User talk:176.11.193.193|talk]]) 14:30, 30 July 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:31, 30 July 2013
![]() | Cycling Stub‑class | |||||||||
|
![]() | France Stub‑class | |||||||||
|
Polkadot jersey transition
Currently, the table states that after the 16th stage, Massi wore the polkadot jersey, and that Rinero received it after the 17th stage. This is strange, because the results of the 17th stage were nullified. The memoire du cyclisme archive shows that Massi did not start the 18th stage, so from that source I conclude that Rinero received the polkadot jersey after the 18th stage. Actually, these tables need to be sourced, so the details can be checked. --EdgeNavidad (talk) 08:35, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Riders Protest / Strike
I don't understand why there is no mention of the stage 17 riders strike. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.89.13.124 (talk) 19:00, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- It is because nobody, including you, has added it yet. You seem to know how to add it on the this talk page, you can use the same method to add it on the articele. --EdgeNavidad (Talk · Contribs) 06:07, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Doping
The main bulk of the coverage of the EPO-retests should be in an separate article, like there is an separate article about the Festina affair, and/or maybe there should be an article called Doping the the 1998 Tour de France, but to have so much about the retests (which were quite random, as so few were tested, and so many tests missing/ruined in 2004) and so little about the Festina affair, which showed that basically the whole peloton was on everything they could get hold of in 1998, makes the article skewed. --176.11.193.193 (talk) 14:30, 30 July 2013 (UTC)