Jump to content

User talk:Garik: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cal beu (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
{{archives|search=yes}}
{{archives|search=yes}}


== Possible interview ==
Hi, Garik! I'm a writer for Jezebel.com; I'm working on an article about the people that edit wikipedia articles about sex, and I'd love to ask you a few questions. If interested, will you please email me at callie@jezebel.com? Thank you!
== xth ==
== xth ==
Thanks for answer my friend. [[User:Alborzagros|Alborzagros]] ([[User talk:Alborzagros|talk]]) 04:23, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for answer my friend. [[User:Alborzagros|Alborzagros]] ([[User talk:Alborzagros|talk]]) 04:23, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:26, 30 July 2013


Possible interview

Hi, Garik! I'm a writer for Jezebel.com; I'm working on an article about the people that edit wikipedia articles about sex, and I'd love to ask you a few questions. If interested, will you please email me at callie@jezebel.com? Thank you!

xth

Thanks for answer my friend. Alborzagros (talk) 04:23, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ideas

Firstly thanks for the work over at Talk:Homosexuality. Secondly, do you have any input or suggestions for my current article (in progress) at User:Jenova20/List of suggested causes of homosexuality? Thanks Jenova20 (email) 22:03, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... I'll take a look at it when I have time and see if I have anything to add. It's a good idea for an article. garik (talk) 03:47, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. We have a lot of this stuff in other articles but i think this is a good idea to put it all in one place. Some of the crazy ones are surprizingly easy to source. Have a nice day Jenova20 (email) 11:45, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for agreeing with the first me! I don't think it needs a hyphen either, but then I saw via Google Books that it sometimes/often does have one in published texts. Still, it looks better without one, but I'm leery of edit wars these days. Glad you took my original lead. Moncrief (talk) 17:20, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Garik,

Thanks.

Any other advice welcomed: I think the Wiki system is really superb -- but on a couple of sections where I happen to know about the subject I've run into posts which are basically olde wives tales. So I'd like my inserts and stuff to be useful, in good form, and of course correctly formatted so that editors can find them and do their thing.

On the history of the Internet, for instance, a great deal of what is known out there is just confectionery dreamed up by the PR department of MCI while Vint Cerf was a Vice President there. Vint was in fact one of the very big players: his development of TCP/IP and the background machinery to make it work was one of the major steps in making the whole thing useable by normal human beings as opposed to obsessive tekkies. The PR stories that go around, however, are embarassing to him and untrue to history, which is a damn shame.

Thanks again, and

Cheers, -dlj. DavidLJ (talk) 16:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My father knew ....

Like that change, much better ----Snowded TALK 04:10, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]