Talk:LGA 1150: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:24, 4 August 2013

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the LGA 1150 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Mainstream LGA1155 v Enthusiast LGA2011

If you know it, please add the answer. Is LGA1150 the successor only to the Intel "mainstream" LGA1155 socket or also to the Intel "enthusiast" LGA2011 socket? Intel uses these two categories for all their processor sockets and I cannot find an answer concerning the "enthuasiast" class socket for Haswell Extreme CPUs. 37.136.44.70 (talk) 12:53, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PCI support ?

There's Z87 based Intel mainboards with PCI http://ark.intel.com/fr/compare/75010,70903,72031,69045,70898

But the Z87 chipset spec shows it has no PCI support http://ark.intel.com/fr/products/75013/Intel-DH82Z87-PCH?q=z87

Same for most chipsets. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FCartegnie (talk • contribs) 12:53, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, chipset ITSELF doesn't support PCI, but that don't prevent mainboard manufactures to add PCI support themselves via another chipset. 88.102.84.189 (talk) 13:24, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Xeon chipset?

The article mentions "C228", but there's no such thing at ark.intel.com. However, there IS a C226, and Asus even has released P9D WS. So, the "c228" is definitely a mistake, duplicated thousandfolds across the Internet. Bolkhov (talk) 15:23, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 Same for most chipsets.  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:FCartegnie|FCartegnie]] ([[User talk:FCartegnie|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/FCartegnie|contribs]]) 12:53, 19 June 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+Well, chipset ITSELF doesn't support PCI, but that don't prevent mainboard manufactures to add PCI support themselves via another chipset.
+[[Special:Contributions/88.102.84.189|88.102.84.189]] ([[User talk:88.102.84.189|talk]]) 13:24, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
 == Xeon chipset? ==