Talk:9K38 Igla: Difference between revisions
Fixed B-Class Checklist |
m →Reload |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Is it reloadable? Which is the feed mechanism?? --[[Special:Contributions/201.141.211.189|201.141.211.189]] ([[User talk:201.141.211.189|talk]]) 00:01, 21 March 2008 (UTC) |
Is it reloadable? Which is the feed mechanism?? --[[Special:Contributions/201.141.211.189|201.141.211.189]] ([[User talk:201.141.211.189|talk]]) 00:01, 21 March 2008 (UTC) |
||
Igla is not reloadable as a such. Empty launch tubes may be recycled and reused, however. [[User:Humu|Humu]] ([[User talk:Humu|talk]]) 06:45, 15 August 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== SA-18 in czech army == |
== SA-18 in czech army == |
Revision as of 06:45, 15 August 2013
Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Russian & Soviet C‑class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Russia: Technology & engineering / Military C‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||||||||
|
Other sources
Ok. This site seems to have a lot of conflicting and wrong information about many things. Here's a link with conflicting information:
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Aircraft/Missiles/SA-16.html
Service
Why does it say "Entered service - 1990s" in the infobox, when the rest of the text gives 1981 and 1983 as service entry dates?
Also check out this link: http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1710251&lastnode_id=0 It says: "The SA-16 was also introduced this year (1986). This was the full development of the SA-18."
Reload
Is it reloadable? Which is the feed mechanism?? --201.141.211.189 (talk) 00:01, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Igla is not reloadable as a such. Empty launch tubes may be recycled and reused, however. Humu (talk) 06:45, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
SA-18 in czech army
Czech army doesn't use SA-18. It is not listed in czech inventory and especially during acquiring RBS-70 it was many time mentioned that only older man-portable system in czech inventory is Strela-2M (SA-7B). I really don't know where somebody find info about SA-18 used by czech army.PN79 (talk) 13:18, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Compared to 9K34 Strela-3
So, all things considered, is this a better system than 9K34 Strela-3? Aldrich Hanssen (talk) 11:44, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Comparison to Stinger
Does anyone have a source regarding the Stinger's engagement envelope? I find it very hard to believe that a missile that has a maximum speed of 700-750m/s is capable of engaging a receding target flying at approximately the same speed, especially since the Igla, Igla-1 and Strela-3 can only engage targets flying at roughly half their respective meximum speeds. 142.151.138.146 (talk) 05:04, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Above
Yes it's right, if you look here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIM-92_Stinger you won't find anything. I thing someone just wrote something wrong. pls correct !! --93.193.90.132 (talk) 17:28, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- C-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- C-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
- Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
- C-Class Russia articles
- Mid-importance Russia articles
- Mid-importance C-Class Russia articles
- C-Class Russia (technology and engineering) articles
- Technology and engineering in Russia task force articles
- WikiProject Russia articles