Jump to content

Talk:9K38 Igla: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Fixed B-Class Checklist
Humu (talk | contribs)
Line 16: Line 16:


Is it reloadable? Which is the feed mechanism?? --[[Special:Contributions/201.141.211.189|201.141.211.189]] ([[User talk:201.141.211.189|talk]]) 00:01, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Is it reloadable? Which is the feed mechanism?? --[[Special:Contributions/201.141.211.189|201.141.211.189]] ([[User talk:201.141.211.189|talk]]) 00:01, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Igla is not reloadable as a such. Empty launch tubes may be recycled and reused, however. [[User:Humu|Humu]] ([[User talk:Humu|talk]]) 06:45, 15 August 2013 (UTC)


== SA-18 in czech army ==
== SA-18 in czech army ==

Revision as of 06:45, 15 August 2013

WikiProject iconMilitary history: Technology / Weaponry / Russian & Soviet C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Military science, technology, and theory task force
Taskforce icon
Weaponry task force
Taskforce icon
Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
WikiProject iconRussia: Technology & engineering / Military C‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia.
To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

Other sources

Ok. This site seems to have a lot of conflicting and wrong information about many things. Here's a link with conflicting information:

http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Aircraft/Missiles/SA-16.html

Service

Why does it say "Entered service - 1990s" in the infobox, when the rest of the text gives 1981 and 1983 as service entry dates?

Also check out this link: http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1710251&lastnode_id=0 It says: "The SA-16 was also introduced this year (1986). This was the full development of the SA-18."

Reload

Is it reloadable? Which is the feed mechanism?? --201.141.211.189 (talk) 00:01, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Igla is not reloadable as a such. Empty launch tubes may be recycled and reused, however. Humu (talk) 06:45, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SA-18 in czech army

Czech army doesn't use SA-18. It is not listed in czech inventory and especially during acquiring RBS-70 it was many time mentioned that only older man-portable system in czech inventory is Strela-2M (SA-7B). I really don't know where somebody find info about SA-18 used by czech army.PN79 (talk) 13:18, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Compared to 9K34 Strela-3

So, all things considered, is this a better system than 9K34 Strela-3? Aldrich Hanssen (talk) 11:44, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison to Stinger

Does anyone have a source regarding the Stinger's engagement envelope? I find it very hard to believe that a missile that has a maximum speed of 700-750m/s is capable of engaging a receding target flying at approximately the same speed, especially since the Igla, Igla-1 and Strela-3 can only engage targets flying at roughly half their respective meximum speeds. 142.151.138.146 (talk) 05:04, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Above

Yes it's right, if you look here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIM-92_Stinger you won't find anything. I thing someone just wrote something wrong. pls correct !! --93.193.90.132 (talk) 17:28, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]