Jump to content

User talk:Wwoods: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 55: Line 55:


==unexplained archiving of talk page for Rachels tomb==
==unexplained archiving of talk page for Rachels tomb==
Hi! Can you explain this please - {{diff|Talk:Rachel's Tomb|prev|477281741|this edit} - I can see no need for archiving on this rather short talk page, and i note no discussion, or attempt to form consensus. Cheers! [[Special:Contributions/86.56.63.5|86.56.63.5]] ([[User talk:86.56.63.5|talk]]) 10:26, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi! Can you explain this please - {{diff|Talk:Rachel's Tomb|prev|477281741|this edit}} - I can see no need for archiving on this rather short talk page, and i note no discussion, or attempt to form consensus. Cheers! [[Special:Contributions/86.56.63.5|86.56.63.5]] ([[User talk:86.56.63.5|talk]]) 10:26, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
: It wasn't short before archiving ... over a year ago. Using the bot is easier than manual archiving. What's the problem?
:[[User:Wwoods|—WWoods]] ([[User talk:Wwoods#top|talk]]) 13:45, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:45, 17 August 2013

Thanks for the fix

Hi, thanks for the fix here. I think that was my first time trying to set up archiving. I copied-and-pasted from somewhere else but clearly I didn't clean up all the things I needed to. I'll get it right next time! Zad68 04:16, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited China General Nuclear Power Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Xinghua (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:42, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wolseong Nuclear Power Plant

Hi, Wwoods. I found the Wolseong Nuclear Power Plant and it seems that it needs some work. Could you please take a look? Thank you. Beagel (talk) 19:22, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did something wrong when archiving

Hi, Wwoods. We met more than a year ago. I asked you to add archive bots in a few articles related to Brazilian history. I came here to ask you a favor. I added an archive bot to the talk page of Portuguese language. The talk page probably had one in the past but someone may have erased it for some reason. The problem is that when I added the bot again it archived all discussions on page 1 of the arhives, when it should have done it on page 7.[1] Do you know how to fix it? --Lecen (talk) 14:33, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. I copied the new section, rolled the page back, re-added that section, and fixed the archiving bot: diff.
—WWoods (talk) 15:29, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! I really appreciate your help. --Lecen (talk) 15:52, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Family tree

Hello. I was trying to make a family tree today and ended up wasting hours without figuring how to do it right. I saw that you have designed Template:House of Eorl and thought I'd ask you if you could help me. If you're interested, take a look at User:Mohamed CJ/Al Khawalid. Mohamed CJ (talk) 15:30, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. I spent few more hours and got it :P Mohamed CJ (talk) 16:59, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files missing description details

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:06, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

unexplained archiving of talk page for Rachels tomb

Hi! Can you explain this please - this edit - I can see no need for archiving on this rather short talk page, and i note no discussion, or attempt to form consensus. Cheers! 86.56.63.5 (talk) 10:26, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't short before archiving ... over a year ago. Using the bot is easier than manual archiving. What's the problem?
—WWoods (talk) 13:45, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]