Talk:Virginia Society for Human Life: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:11, 9 September 2013

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Abortion Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Abortion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Abortion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AbortionWikipedia:WikiProject AbortionTemplate:WikiProject AbortionAbortion articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Virginia Society for Human Life

Removed PROD from this article. I'm not at all sure that it's a valid article, but it's very obviously not an uncontroversial deletion, so you will need to take it to AfD. Tigerboy1966 19:58, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is The Oldest Right to Life Organization Not Historically Significant

This article is significant due to it being the oldest right to life article. It was redirected in July 2013 by an editor and then restored in September and then promptly nominated for deletion by the same editor who deleted all the material and redirected the article in July. More comments needed here.

Please remember history should not be subject to agendas. This harms the credibility of Wikipedia.

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 == Why is The Oldest Right to Life Organization Not Historically Significant ==
-This article is significant due to it being the oldest right to life article. It was redirected in July 2013 by an editor and then restored in September and then promptly nominated for deletion by the same editor who deleted all the material and redirected the article in July. More comments needed here.  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/208.54.40.177|208.54.40.177]] ([[User talk:208.54.40.177|talk]]) 06:05, 9 September 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+This article is significant due to it being the oldest right to life article. It was redirected in July 2013 by an editor and then restored in September and then promptly nominated for deletion by the same editor who deleted all the material and redirected the article in July. More comments needed here.
+Please remember history should not be subject to agendas. This harms the credibility of Wikipedia.