User talk:183.89.118.75: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
ClueBot NG (talk | contribs) Warning 183.89.118.75 - #1 |
Undid revision 578572069 by [[Special:Contrib�U� ����lueBot NG|ClueBot NG]] (talk) - false positive - reported |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Thank you. I've already seen the Star's 'opinion' (note that by their definition, the [[R80XL]] doesn't qualify), lamentable PR spiel IMHO. [[Special:Contributions/183.89.118.75|183.89.118.75]] ([[User talk:183.89.118.75#top|talk]]) 22:20, 23 October 2013 (UTC) |
:Thank you. I've already seen the Star's 'opinion' (note that by their definition, the [[R80XL]] doesn't qualify), lamentable PR spiel IMHO. [[Special:Contributions/183.89.118.75|183.89.118.75]] ([[User talk:183.89.118.75#top|talk]]) 22:20, 23 October 2013 (UTC) |
||
== October 2013 == |
|||
[[Image:Information.svg|left|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to [[:Georgia]] has been undone by an automated computer program called [[User:ClueBot NG|ClueBot NG]]. |
|||
{{clear}} |
|||
* ClueBot NG makes very few [[User:ClueBot NG#Information About False Positives|mistakes]], but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please [[User:ClueBot NG#Information About False Positives|read about it]], [{{User:ClueBot NG/Warnings/FPReport|0}} report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again. |
|||
* For help, take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|introduction]]. |
|||
* The following is the log entry regarding this message: [[Georgia]] was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Georgia&diff=578572058&oldid=578571633 changed] by [[Special:Contributions/183.89.118.75|183.89.118.75]] [[User:183.89.118.75|(u)]] [[User talk:183.89.118.75|(t)]] ANN scored at 0.900891 on 2013-10-24T17:07:45+00:00 <!-- MySQL ID: 0 -->. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> [[User:ClueBot NG|ClueBot NG]] ([[User talk:ClueBot NG|talk]]) 17:07, 24 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:22, 24 October 2013
Ferris vs. Observation
While there are plenty of third-party usages of the term "Ferris" wheel, I believe the trend is to get away from the catch-all term "Ferris" wheel and call the large models observation wheels. Ronald Bussink told me that Geroge Ferris got the recognition he deserved throughout the last century. Now it's time to modernize the name. You might find this article interesting: http://www.melbournestar.com/plan-your-visit/giant-observation-wheels.html —JlACEer (talk) 19:41, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you. I've already seen the Star's 'opinion' (note that by their definition, the R80XL doesn't qualify), lamentable PR spiel IMHO. 183.89.118.75 (talk) 22:20, 23 October 2013 (UTC)