This is the combined talk page for ClueBot NG and ClueBot III. These users are automated computer programs and are not humans. Please be aware that bots cannot think like a human and cannot operate outside of their programming. Messages you leave on this talk page will not be answered by a bot – either a bot operator or another human will answer you.
False positives and false negatives
If you believe that ClueBot NG has mistakenly identified a good edit as vandalism, please follow the directions in the warning it gave or click here. Please do not report it on this talk page. It takes less time to report the case to the correct location, and we can handle it more effectively there. If you believe that ClueBot NG has missed an edit that is vandalism, again do not report it here. ClueBot is unable to catch all vandalism. Just revert the edit and warn the editor.
We are aware that there is an issue with reporting false positives. A fix is being worked on.
This page is for comments on or questions about the ClueBots.
The current status of ClueBot NG is: Running The current status of ClueBot III is: Running Praise should go on the praise page. Barnstars and other awards should go on the awards page. Use the "new section" button at the top of this page to add a new section. Use the [edit] link above each section to edit that section. This page is automatically archived by ClueBot III. The ClueBots' owner or someone else who knows the answer to your question will reply on this page.
When I was looking through ClueBot NG's contributions, I noticed that it wasn't reporting users to AIV even though they had received a final/only warning. I then checked its contributions in the Wikipedia namespace and found that the bot hasn't made an AIV report since September 22. Is there a reason why? — MRD2014Talk 00:39, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
The Best and the most finest, vandalism reverter. Thanks, for those great contributions, in a attempt to clear vandalism. :) Rekonedth (talk) 13:29, 15 November 2018 (UTC)