Shared disk file system: Difference between revisions
Gardar Rurak (talk | contribs) Disambig link using AWB |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
There are different architectural approaches to a SAN File System. Some distribute file information across all the servers in a clusters (fully distributed). Others utilize a centralized metadata server (centralized). Both achieve the same result of enabling all servers to access all the data on a SAN. |
There are different architectural approaches to a SAN File System. Some distribute file information across all the servers in a clusters (fully distributed). Others utilize a centralized metadata server (centralized). Both achieve the same result of enabling all servers to access all the data on a SAN. |
||
Examples of SAN File Systems include the [[Global File System]] and [[OCFS|Oracle Cluster File System]]. |
Examples of SAN File Systems include the [[Global File System]], the [[SAN File System]], and [[OCFS|Oracle Cluster File System]]. |
||
[[Category:Computer storage]] |
[[Category:Computer storage]] |
Revision as of 01:48, 11 June 2006
In enterprise storage, a SAN file system is a file system which has been optimized to be shared by multiple clustered servers over a storage area network. SAN file systems are like network attached storage (NAS) protocols (like SMB and NFS) in that they allow multiple computers to access the same file system (and even file) at the same time. However, unlike NAS networks, SAN file systems use a faster block storage access method.
There are different architectural approaches to a SAN File System. Some distribute file information across all the servers in a clusters (fully distributed). Others utilize a centralized metadata server (centralized). Both achieve the same result of enabling all servers to access all the data on a SAN.
Examples of SAN File Systems include the Global File System, the SAN File System, and Oracle Cluster File System.