User talk:121.222.35.118

User:L'Origine du monde

Are you User:L'Origine du monde, whose latest request to be unblocked was just turned down yesterday by Kim Dent-Brown? You edit just like User:L'Origine du monde. Flyer22 (talk) 11:18, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

No.121.222.35.118 (talk) 11:21, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

And I don't believe you. You have shown up out of nowhere (a day after L'Origine du monde's latest unblock request was turned down), clearly are not new to editing Wikipedia, have the same WP:Edit summary style as L'Origine du monde (including having just now attempted to sign your username in it), and you are focusing on genitals (which is what L'Origine du monde mostly focused on). I am very familiar with the way that L'Origine du monde carried out edit summaries, the exact style (including rationale, etc.), and it is highly unlikely that another person would have that same style. But I call on BullRangifer and Beeblebrox, two editors who are likely close to being as familiar with that style as I am, to analyze this matter now. BullRangifer might be on the same level as I am with regard to recognizing L'Origine du monde's style of editing. I also contact WP:CheckUser AGK as, though IPs are not usually publicly tied to registered accounts (unless they are a WP:Proxy) by WP:CheckUsers (per Wikipedia:CheckUser#IP information disclosure), he might find this 121.222.35.118 IP as suspicious as I do and feel that this is an exception with regard to publicly tying an IP to a registered account. Flyer22 (talk) 11:51, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Does User:L'Origine du monde ever use an Australian IP address? I get the impression that he, probably she, lives in the UK and hence uses UK IP addresses eg 93.96.148.42. My IP address is an Australian IP address. Having glanced at some of that user's edits, I would have to disagree with your allegation that I edit just like that user. Frankly, I am surprised and taken aback that you should have the temerity to compare me, whom you do not know in any shape or form, to someone who has just got themself banned for vandalism. I am a mathematical physicist - not so much a believer in the 'redeeming power of love' but more in the redeeming power of scientific enquiry and rational analysis. I also believe in extending courtesy to strangers, something you might like to consider for the future.121.222.35.118 (talk) 11:59, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Having just read your extremely unpleasant and personal attack, I welcome the intervention of wikipedia administrators into this matter. You are completely out of line pal.121.222.35.118 (talk) 12:04, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

I have properly used WP:INDENT on your posts above. As for the allegation, a lot of us here take disruption to Wikipedia seriously. L'Origine du monde is a disruptive editor who indeed edits the same way that you do, judging by your edits to Talk:Vagina, Talk:Human vaginal size, Human vaginal size and Childbirth so far (your edit to the Childbirth article is not too indicative of anything, but it is the same L'Origine du monde style of bouncing from one related article, to add a link or whatever, back to the main article again very soon). No one should be surprised by the comparison; see your edit summary style vs. L'Origine du monde's edit summary style (where, for example, you both post things, such as headings, that are not designed to go into the edit summaries); there are also the different IPs that L'Origine du monde used (currently displayed on L'Origine du monde's user talk page) to use as comparisons. In cases such as these, I disregard WP:Don't bite the newbies. Not that I think you are a newbie. Again, you clearly have experience editing Wikipedia. And L'Origine du monde did not get banned (see WP:Ban); L'Origine du monde is indefinitely blocked (see WP:Block), and not for vandalism...but for WP:Disruptive editing (officially not being here to build an encyclopedia). Your confusing what a ban is with what a block is, as well as confusing what counts as a WP:Personal attack is more behavior that is similar to L'Origine du monde's behavior. If I don't start to see you at just about every genital topic possible, then I might believe your claim that you are not L'Origine du monde.

As for an administrator, AGK is one and will likely be at this talk page to review this matter. Flyer22 (talk) 12:29, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

As I have already stated quite clearly, I am not User:L'Origine du monde. I have no idea why my IP address should have changed in the last day or so. Probably, my provider BigPond reset it as they are wont to do from time to time. I am not sure what I have to do to prove to you that I am not the person whom you have made up your mind that I am, other than to try the broken record approach when seeking a refund from a surly and suspicious shop assistant. So again: I am not User:L'Origine du monde. Got it?121.222.35.118 (talk) 12:40, 10 November 2013 (UTC)