Jump to content

Monstrous coalition: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Created page with '{{multiple image | align = right | direction = vertical | header = Leaders of the „monstrous coalition” | width = | image1 = Carol Popp de Sz...'
 
clean up, unlink dates per WP:DATELINK, replaced: 1863 → 1863 (4), 2 May → 2 May using AWB
Line 3: Line 3:
| direction = vertical
| direction = vertical
| header = Leaders of the „monstrous coalition”
| header = Leaders of the „monstrous coalition”
| width =
| width =


| image1 = Carol Popp de Szathmary - C. A. Rosetti1.jpg
| image1 = Carol Popp de Szathmary - C. A. Rosetti1.jpg
Line 25: Line 25:
Although at the first analysis a coalition between the political left (radicals) and the political right (conservatives) can be labeled as unnatural, it was logical if it's discussed within the political context, the personal authoritarian regime introduced by Cuza.
Although at the first analysis a coalition between the political left (radicals) and the political right (conservatives) can be labeled as unnatural, it was logical if it's discussed within the political context, the personal authoritarian regime introduced by Cuza.


Authoritarian tendencies manifested by the ruler became apparent early in [[1863]], and the personal regime was installed after the [[coup d'etat|coup]] of [[2 May]] [[1864]]. He increased his own power at the expense of other institutions. On 10 May, Cuza amended, through plebiscite, the [[Paris Convention]] which has hitherto functioned as Constitution for the [[United Principalities]], transforming it into Developing Statues of the Paris Convention.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.historia.ro/exclusiv_web/actualitate/articol/cuza-erou-dictator |title=Cuza, erou sau dictator? |newspaper=Historia.ro |author=Florin Marin, Mihai Voinea |date=26 January 2011}}</ref> The most important change was the redistribution of state organization so that the ruler should have more powers. From this point, political scene was divided into two camps: cuzists and opposition. Moreover, the ruler understood to govern over political groups with trustworthy people, of moderate shades, as [[Mihail Kogălniceanu]] or [[Nicolae Crețulescu]].<ref>Smeu, Georgeta, ''Dicționar de Istoria Românilor'', Bucharest, Trei Publishing House, 1997</ref>
Authoritarian tendencies manifested by the ruler became apparent early in 1863, and the personal regime was installed after the [[coup d'etat|coup]] of 2 May 1864. He increased his own power at the expense of other institutions. On 10 May, Cuza amended, through plebiscite, the [[Paris Convention]] which has hitherto functioned as Constitution for the [[United Principalities]], transforming it into Developing Statues of the Paris Convention.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.historia.ro/exclusiv_web/actualitate/articol/cuza-erou-dictator |title=Cuza, erou sau dictator? |newspaper=Historia.ro |author=Florin Marin, Mihai Voinea |date=26 January 2011}}</ref> The most important change was the redistribution of state organization so that the ruler should have more powers. From this point, political scene was divided into two camps: cuzists and opposition. Moreover, the ruler understood to govern over political groups with trustworthy people, of moderate shades, as [[Mihail Kogălniceanu]] or [[Nicolae Crețulescu]].<ref>Smeu, Georgeta, ''Dicționar de Istoria Românilor'', Bucharest, Trei Publishing House, 1997</ref>


Therefore, it was natural that the opposition to form a coalition against the ruler and his personal regime, despite this opposition consisted of groups opposite on the political spectrum.
Therefore, it was natural that the opposition to form a coalition against the ruler and his personal regime, despite this opposition consisted of groups opposite on the political spectrum.
Line 32: Line 32:


== Consequences ==
== Consequences ==
The „monstrous coalition” consisted of large landowners and businessmen who were not satisfied with the policy of the ruler. Coalition emerged after the National Assembly elections in Romania, second convocation, in 1864, and was chaired by [[Ion C. Brătianu]]. Mihail Kogălniceanu remained loyal to Alexandru Ioan Cuza. In [[1866]], the coalition gave a coup d'etat. On the morning of 11 February, five o'clock, a group of soldiers entered the Royal Palace and forced the ruler to accept the abdication. Cuza was forced to swear that he will abdicate, after seven years of reign, to leave the throne to a foreign prince, as is required in one of the provisions of ad-hoc divans of [[1857]].<ref>Lieutenant Colonel Popescu Lumină, ''Universul'', 17 August 1932</ref> The unionist press related that ''the argument of this heinous act was the charge that the elected ruler would have betrayed the interests of the country to a foreign power''.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://jurnalul.ro/calendar/cuza-si-monstruoasa-coalitie-636333.html# |title=Cuza și „monstruoasa coaliție” |newspaper=Jurnalul Național |author=Tudor Cireș |date=11 February 2013}}</ref>
The „monstrous coalition” consisted of large landowners and businessmen who were not satisfied with the policy of the ruler. Coalition emerged after the National Assembly elections in Romania, second convocation, in 1864, and was chaired by [[Ion C. Brătianu]]. Mihail Kogălniceanu remained loyal to Alexandru Ioan Cuza. In 1866, the coalition gave a coup d'etat. On the morning of 11 February, five o'clock, a group of soldiers entered the Royal Palace and forced the ruler to accept the abdication. Cuza was forced to swear that he will abdicate, after seven years of reign, to leave the throne to a foreign prince, as is required in one of the provisions of ad-hoc divans of 1857.<ref>Lieutenant Colonel Popescu Lumină, ''Universul'', 17 August 1932</ref> The unionist press related that ''the argument of this heinous act was the charge that the elected ruler would have betrayed the interests of the country to a foreign power''.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://jurnalul.ro/calendar/cuza-si-monstruoasa-coalitie-636333.html# |title=Cuza și "monstruoasa coaliție" |newspaper=Jurnalul Național |author=Tudor Cireș |date=11 February 2013}}</ref>


Two days later, on 13 February, Cuza leaves [[Bucharest]], taking the road of [[Vienna]], and, after him, on 10 May 1866, [[Carol I of Romania|Prince Karl of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen]] is proclaimed ruler of Romania, under the name of Carol I. Subsequently, Carol was asked to allow Cuza return home. The monarch sent the request to the Council of Ministers that rejected it.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://jurnalul.ro/editorial/istoria-ca-telenovela-o-natie-fara-principii-clare-22506.html |title=Istoria ca telenovela - O nație fără principii clare |newspaper=Jurnalul Național |author=Ion Cristoiu |date=30 April 2006}}</ref>
Two days later, on 13 February, Cuza leaves [[Bucharest]], taking the road of [[Vienna]], and, after him, on 10 May 1866, [[Carol I of Romania|Prince Karl of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen]] is proclaimed ruler of Romania, under the name of Carol I. Subsequently, Carol was asked to allow Cuza return home. The monarch sent the request to the Council of Ministers that rejected it.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://jurnalul.ro/editorial/istoria-ca-telenovela-o-natie-fara-principii-clare-22506.html |title=Istoria ca telenovela - O nație fără principii clare |newspaper=Jurnalul Național |author=Ion Cristoiu |date=30 April 2006}}</ref>

== References ==
== References ==
{{Reflist}}
{{Reflist}}

[[ro:Monstruoasa coaliție]]
[[ru:Чудовищная коалиция]]


[[Category:History of Romania]]
[[Category:History of Romania]]
[[Category:Coups d'état]]
[[Category:Coups d'état]]
[[Category:1866 in Romania]]
[[Category:1866 in Romania]]

[[ro:Monstruoasa coaliție]]
[[ru:Чудовищная коалиция]]

Revision as of 11:20, 29 November 2013

Leaders of the „monstrous coalition”
C. A. Rosetti (1816–1885)
Lascăr Catargiu (1823–1899)
Ion Ghica (1816–1897)

„Monstrous coalition” (Romanian: Monstruoasa coaliție) is the name that has remained in the collective consciousness as alliance between conservatives and radical liberals in order to Alexandru Ioan Cuza's removal. This name was promoted in epoch by press favorable to Cuza.

Background

Although at the first analysis a coalition between the political left (radicals) and the political right (conservatives) can be labeled as unnatural, it was logical if it's discussed within the political context, the personal authoritarian regime introduced by Cuza.

Authoritarian tendencies manifested by the ruler became apparent early in 1863, and the personal regime was installed after the coup of 2 May 1864. He increased his own power at the expense of other institutions. On 10 May, Cuza amended, through plebiscite, the Paris Convention which has hitherto functioned as Constitution for the United Principalities, transforming it into Developing Statues of the Paris Convention.[1] The most important change was the redistribution of state organization so that the ruler should have more powers. From this point, political scene was divided into two camps: cuzists and opposition. Moreover, the ruler understood to govern over political groups with trustworthy people, of moderate shades, as Mihail Kogălniceanu or Nicolae Crețulescu.[2]

Therefore, it was natural that the opposition to form a coalition against the ruler and his personal regime, despite this opposition consisted of groups opposite on the political spectrum.

Leaders of this coalition were radical C. A. Rosetti, conservative Lascăr Catargiu and moderate Ion Ghica.

Consequences

The „monstrous coalition” consisted of large landowners and businessmen who were not satisfied with the policy of the ruler. Coalition emerged after the National Assembly elections in Romania, second convocation, in 1864, and was chaired by Ion C. Brătianu. Mihail Kogălniceanu remained loyal to Alexandru Ioan Cuza. In 1866, the coalition gave a coup d'etat. On the morning of 11 February, five o'clock, a group of soldiers entered the Royal Palace and forced the ruler to accept the abdication. Cuza was forced to swear that he will abdicate, after seven years of reign, to leave the throne to a foreign prince, as is required in one of the provisions of ad-hoc divans of 1857.[3] The unionist press related that the argument of this heinous act was the charge that the elected ruler would have betrayed the interests of the country to a foreign power.[4]

Two days later, on 13 February, Cuza leaves Bucharest, taking the road of Vienna, and, after him, on 10 May 1866, Prince Karl of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen is proclaimed ruler of Romania, under the name of Carol I. Subsequently, Carol was asked to allow Cuza return home. The monarch sent the request to the Council of Ministers that rejected it.[5]

References

  1. ^ Florin Marin, Mihai Voinea (26 January 2011). "Cuza, erou sau dictator?". Historia.ro.
  2. ^ Smeu, Georgeta, Dicționar de Istoria Românilor, Bucharest, Trei Publishing House, 1997
  3. ^ Lieutenant Colonel Popescu Lumină, Universul, 17 August 1932
  4. ^ Tudor Cireș (11 February 2013). "Cuza și "monstruoasa coaliție"". Jurnalul Național.
  5. ^ Ion Cristoiu (30 April 2006). "Istoria ca telenovela - O nație fără principii clare". Jurnalul Național.