Talk:Malicious Damage Act 1861: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
banner shell |
upr |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | |||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell| |
|||
{{ |
{{WikiProject Law|class=Start|importance=Low}} |
||
| ⚫ | |||
}} |
|||
== Extent == |
== Extent == |
||
Revision as of 03:36, 7 December 2013
Please add
{{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details..svg){kind=small} | Politics of the United Kingdom Start‑class | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Please add
{{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. | Law Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Extent
The original text of this article said that this Act was extended to Canada and to Trinidad and Tobago but did not give any sources. Could someone either confirm or deny this with details? James500 (talk) 13:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
1827 Act
This Act does not have a statutory short title. I am not sure if it should be labelled as the Malicious Injuries Act 1827, the Malicious Injuries to Property Act 1827 or anything else. James500 (talk) 13:34, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Malicious Damage Bill 1964
This may be relevant http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1964/jun/23/malicious-damage-bill James500 (talk) 13:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
To do
- Amdendments other than repeals in E, W, NI?
- Repeals in E, W, NI done but may need to be redone section by section
- Repeals and amendments in ROI
- Case law
- Derivation of sections from Davis