Jump to content

User:Blu Aardvark: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
unblocked
Blu Aardvark (talk | contribs)
m Archiving, link correction
Line 1: Line 1:
Unblocked in order to participate in arbitration. [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 22:23, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Unblocked in order to participate in arbitration. [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 22:23, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
User ban extended to indefinite due to repeated sockpuppet activity, which has included page vandalism: see [[:Category:Wikipedia:Suspected sockpuppets of Blu Aardvark]]. --[[User:NicholasTurnbull|Nicholas'''Turnbull''']] | [[User_talk:NicholasTurnbull|(talk)]] 04:56, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
User ban extended to indefinite due to repeated sockpuppet activity, which has included page vandalism: see [[:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Blu Aardvark]]. --[[User:NicholasTurnbull|Nicholas'''Turnbull''']] | [[User_talk:NicholasTurnbull|(talk)]] 04:56, 2 April 2006 (UTC)


The apology that was here before is now on a user subpage, [[User talk:Blu Aardvark/Apology]]

==Apology==
Before I get back to recentchanges (assuming this account stays unblocked for that log), I'd like to make use of this space to make an apology to the parties involved. I'd post it on WP:ANI, but that page causes problems for my browser, and I'd rather not try and edit it with Lynx.

First and foremost, my behaviour with sockpuppets was ridiculously innappropriate, and my launching of personal attacks against various contributors both on- and off-wiki doubly so. I hereby apologize for my actions.

Also, for the sake of the people who question whether I am Blu Aardvark on Wikipedia Review, I am the same person. Some see this as a red herring, others as a legitimate concern, so allow me to clear it once and for all.

By editing Wikipedia, I agree that I will follow Wikipedia's guidelines and policies to the extent that can be reasonably expected of any contributor. In addition, to avoid further conflict, I agree to avoid confrontation with those who feel victimized by my earlier behavior. I will also steer clear from disputes relating to my involvement in WR, to avoid further poisioning the water.

I do not intend to attack editors on sites not affiliated with Wikipedia, such as WR. I may from time to time make postings that could concievably be read as a personal attack, but please note that I do not intend them as such. As for actions by other posters on WR, I intend to maintain my policy as before. If I see something that appears to be highly out-of-line, or if I am contacted about a post or member of the forum, I will look into it and possibly take action, but I cannot assume responsibility for the actions of other members of Wikipedia Review.

I do regret the situation that has developed regarding Katefan0's departure, but find I can assume no responsibility for her decision to leave or for Brandt's actions which led to her decision. I do hope that Wikipedia can realize that, although the situation is clearly regrettable, has not developed because of my actions.

Pretty much, I'd like to return to editing as before, which means quiet Recent Changes patrol and minor editing. (Later on, I may move this to a subpage)

[Note that this is [[User_talk:Blu_Aardvark#Apology_.28Cont..29|continued]].<nowiki>]</nowiki>

Revision as of 12:23, 16 June 2006

Unblocked in order to participate in arbitration. Fred Bauder 22:23, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

User ban extended to indefinite due to repeated sockpuppet activity, which has included page vandalism: see Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Blu Aardvark. --NicholasTurnbull | (talk) 04:56, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

The apology that was here before is now on a user subpage, User talk:Blu Aardvark/Apology