Jump to content

Talk:Popigai impact structure: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Coordinates: 89°59′59″N 179°59′59″W / 89.99972°N 179.99972°W / 89.99972; -179.99972
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m cat
Line 11: Line 11:


Where is Popi really from Norilsk? The page says it's 'just North' of the settlement, but Google Earth says it's over 500 of either one or t'other away from Norilsk. I'm aware that one, other or both could be wrong, so what's the truth? [[User:Lady BlahDeBlah|Lady BlahDeBlah]] ([[User talk:Lady BlahDeBlah|talk]]) 23:46, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Where is Popi really from Norilsk? The page says it's 'just North' of the settlement, but Google Earth says it's over 500 of either one or t'other away from Norilsk. I'm aware that one, other or both could be wrong, so what's the truth? [[User:Lady BlahDeBlah|Lady BlahDeBlah]] ([[User talk:Lady BlahDeBlah|talk]]) 23:46, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

It is at +71° 39' 42.97", +110° 57' 39.59" I've added a link to Google Maps. [[Special:Contributions/70.74.191.229|70.74.191.229]] ([[User talk:70.74.191.229|talk]]) 05:22, 10 January 2014 (UTC)


== Add Crater Infobox? ==
== Add Crater Infobox? ==

Revision as of 05:22, 10 January 2014

WikiProject iconRussia: Physical geography Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia.
To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the physical geography of Russia task force.
WikiProject iconGeology Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconTalk:Popigai impact structure is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Location from Norilsk

Where is Popi really from Norilsk? The page says it's 'just North' of the settlement, but Google Earth says it's over 500 of either one or t'other away from Norilsk. I'm aware that one, other or both could be wrong, so what's the truth? Lady BlahDeBlah (talk) 23:46, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is at +71° 39' 42.97", +110° 57' 39.59" I've added a link to Google Maps. 70.74.191.229 (talk) 05:22, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Add Crater Infobox?

Someone may want to apply crater template {{Infobox crater | crater_name = {{SUBST:PAGENAME}} | image_crater = | alt_crater = | caption_crater = | image_bathymetry = | alt_bathymetry = | caption_bathymetry = | location = | coords = {{coord|89|59|59|N|179|59|59|W|region:ZZ_type:waterbody|display =inline,title}} | type = | basin_countries = | length = | width = | area = | depth = | max-depth = | volume = | rim = | elevation = | cities = | reference = }}

Crater characteristics

--YakbutterT (talk) 23:32, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trustworthyness of Sources

For a piece of news that will shock the diamond dealing world, there is only one source - the Christian Science monitor. This source is repeated all places online, and they are seemlingly the only ones that know about this. Can someone confirm this from more sources? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.9.0.125 (talk) 09:16, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"twice as hard"

The article currently states the diamons at Popigai are "twice as hard" as normal and they contain lonsdaleite. Lonsdaleite has a hardness of 6-7 vs diamond at 10. I see the Russian source and various tabloids do say that, but seems such a claim requires a better source. The translated Russian source is hyping the story (is it a WP:RS?) and the tabloids follow along - any fact checking there? Vsmith (talk) 10:16, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seems a friendly ip has now modified the text and changed the twice as to 58% harder w/ a ref. Thanks, Vsmith (talk) 11:52, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you click the "lonsdaleite" link, the extreme hardness of pure lonsdaleite crystal is explained there. The 6-7 hardness you mention is because it is usually found with impurities that make it softer. There is no way to actually measure the hardness of the stuff found in the crater, because the usual hardness test of something is to scratch it with a diamond, and in this case you can't. But IIRC they found that drill bits coated with these impact diamonds last longer than bits coated with normal diamonds. 69.228.171.70 (talk) 15:40, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reference #5 is bogus

This reference goes to an empty domain with ads. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.101.250.87 (talk) 16:12, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, url change, thanks - Vsmith (talk) 18:54, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]