Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Ray (3rd nomination): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion for Charlie Ray
 
Line 11: Line 11:


I recommend reinstating the redirect to [[Little Manhattan]] or deleting the page all together. ~&nbsp;<span style="color:#FF0000;font-weight:bold;">|&nbsp;<small>[[User:Twsx|twsx]]</small>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Twsx|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Twsx|cont]]</sub></small>&nbsp;|</span>&nbsp;~ 09:29, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
I recommend reinstating the redirect to [[Little Manhattan]] or deleting the page all together. ~&nbsp;<span style="color:#FF0000;font-weight:bold;">|&nbsp;<small>[[User:Twsx|twsx]]</small>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Twsx|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Twsx|cont]]</sub></small>&nbsp;|</span>&nbsp;~ 09:29, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

I recommend KEEPING the page. She is an actress who is notable, having acted in film, television, then film again as recent as 2013. Redirecting her Wikipedia page to a film that contains no information on her is ridiculous. Prior AfD stated that original page should be reinstated if she became "notable". She is classified as an actress, has appeared in multiple mediums, and is represented by an agent. It doesn't get much more "notable" than that. I think Twsx is confusing "notable" with "famous".

Revision as of 09:35, 22 January 2014

Charlie Ray

Charlie Ray (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

3rd nomination for this article (1st=Keep, 2nd=Redirect to Little Manhattan).

Since the last nomination (and thus, the resulting decision) are close to a year old, I figured it would make sense to re-evaluate the situation as the previous decision is being "overturned" by an editor.

Non-notable actress. Article fails WP:GNG, sources given are all primary sources.

I recommend reinstating the redirect to Little Manhattan or deleting the page all together. ~ twsx | talkcont | ~ 09:29, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend KEEPING the page. She is an actress who is notable, having acted in film, television, then film again as recent as 2013. Redirecting her Wikipedia page to a film that contains no information on her is ridiculous. Prior AfD stated that original page should be reinstated if she became "notable". She is classified as an actress, has appeared in multiple mediums, and is represented by an agent. It doesn't get much more "notable" than that. I think Twsx is confusing "notable" with "famous".