Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Neil Armstrong after moonwalk: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
per JJR |
Chick Bowen (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
*'''Support ALT'''--[[User:Theparties|Theparties]] ([[User talk:Theparties|talk]]) 11:17, 4 February 2014 (UTC) |
*'''Support ALT'''--[[User:Theparties|Theparties]] ([[User talk:Theparties|talk]]) 11:17, 4 February 2014 (UTC) |
||
''' Note ''' — The closeup version labeled '''original''' above is actually the 2nd cropped version, i.e. the one we're talking about at this point, per nominator [[User:JJARichardson|JJARichardson]]. [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 19:05, 4 February 2014 (UTC) |
''' Note ''' — The closeup version labeled '''original''' above is actually the 2nd cropped version, i.e. the one we're talking about at this point, per nominator [[User:JJARichardson|JJARichardson]]. [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 19:05, 4 February 2014 (UTC) |
||
:Except that Cirt's and HectorMoffet's votes are about the other one. This is why changing your nomination in the middle was not the best idea. [[User:Chick Bowen|Chick Bowen]] 00:52, 5 February 2014 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
||
{{-}} |
{{-}} |
||
Revision as of 00:52, 5 February 2014
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2014 at 23:36:32 (UTC)
- Reason
- A striking high quality portrait with immense historical significance.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Neil Armstrong
- FP category for this image
- People/Science and engineering or Space/Getting there
- Creator
- Buzz Aldrin
- Support as nominator --JJARichardson (talk) 23:36, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support. Iconic. High EV, High quality image. Also, SCIENCE!!! — Cirt (talk) 17:57, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- Wow-- this has to be one of the most historic images in human history. Good nom! --HectorMoffet (talk) 20:21, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- HectorMoffet, if that is a !vote please be explicit so that nobody miscounts when closing. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:22, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Well, it was my way of saying Support, but I'm new so I don't know the criteria as well as others. :) --HectorMoffet (talk) 10:46, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- HectorMoffet, if that is a !vote please be explicit so that nobody miscounts when closing. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:22, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Comment — Interesting historical shot, but could be cropped more tightly. I want to tell the photographer to take One Small Step forward... Sca (talk) 16:05, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- I have uploaded a cropped version and included it in the nom. JJARichardson (talk) 16:59, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry to quibble, but suggest taking a bit more off the top, which is outta focus anyway. (At full res. Armstrong's stubbly face is interesting.) Sca (talk) 17:16, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- I have uploaded a cropped version and included it in the nom. JJARichardson (talk) 16:59, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- Is that better? I've focused on the face while avoiding cropping out the NASA logo on his spacesuit. JJARichardson (talk) 18:30, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- Update - I've decided to change my nomination to the cropped version. JJARichardson (talk) 18:50, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support I like it — good work! Sca (talk) 21:58, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note to closer: the votes above JJARichardson's "Update" above relate to the image now labeled "alternative." Chick Bowen 00:49, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support ALT--Theparties (talk) 11:17, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Note — The closeup version labeled original above is actually the 2nd cropped version, i.e. the one we're talking about at this point, per nominator JJARichardson. Sca (talk) 19:05, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- Except that Cirt's and HectorMoffet's votes are about the other one. This is why changing your nomination in the middle was not the best idea. Chick Bowen 00:52, 5 February 2014 (UTC)