User talk:Kswarrior: Difference between revisions
→2002 Gujarat violence: Kswarrior, be very very careful when you make edits |
→Notification: new section |
||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
Look, the stuff you are adding there does not belong, the 02' article is about the violence after the incident with the train, so we have but a short summary of the train incident and the article is about the violence which came after. The article is already to big, and going into details which belong on the other article is not needed. [[User:Darkness Shines|Darkness Shines]] ([[User talk:Darkness Shines|talk]]) 13:54, 31 January 2014 (UTC) |
Look, the stuff you are adding there does not belong, the 02' article is about the violence after the incident with the train, so we have but a short summary of the train incident and the article is about the violence which came after. The article is already to big, and going into details which belong on the other article is not needed. [[User:Darkness Shines|Darkness Shines]] ([[User talk:Darkness Shines|talk]]) 13:54, 31 January 2014 (UTC) |
||
:Kswarrior, be very very careful when you make edits, I have seen good editors being blocked and banned when they make edits which do not go down well among majority editors. Try to get a concensus for your edits or atleast make a note on talk page. Also DS, you know it very well that 2002 Gujarat violenec also includes the attack on train, the violence is usually termed as post Godhra. ( You need not reply, I might not check for a long time).-[[User:Sarvajna|sarvajna]] ([[User talk:Sarvajna|talk]]) 15:33, 31 January 2014 (UTC) |
:Kswarrior, be very very careful when you make edits, I have seen good editors being blocked and banned when they make edits which do not go down well among majority editors. Try to get a concensus for your edits or atleast make a note on talk page. Also DS, you know it very well that 2002 Gujarat violenec also includes the attack on train, the violence is usually termed as post Godhra. ( You need not reply, I might not check for a long time).-[[User:Sarvajna|sarvajna]] ([[User talk:Sarvajna|talk]]) 15:33, 31 January 2014 (UTC) |
||
== Notification == |
|||
{{Ivmbox | image = yes | The [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has permitted [[WP:Administrators|administrators]] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to [[India]], [[Pakistan]], and [[Afghanistan]]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], satisfy any [[Wikipedia:Etiquette|standard of behavior]], or follow any [[Wikipedia:List of policies|normal editorial process]]. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "[[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision|Final decision]]" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]], with the appropriate sections of [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures]], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This is a non administrator notification, and will be logged as such on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} --> | valign = center | [[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|35px|alt=|link=]] }} [[User:Darkness Shines|Darkness Shines]] ([[User talk:Darkness Shines|talk]]) 17:54, 7 February 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:54, 7 February 2014
Welcome!
Hello, Kswarrior, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Moonraker (talk) 12:21, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi Kswarrior! welcome to Wikipedia!
Be bold in editing pages and don't let others scare you off! To sign your posts (for eg. on talk pages) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp.
|
Here are some links that you might find useful:
|
You can contribute in many ways
|
January 2014
Hello, I'm Darkness Shines. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Darkness Shines (talk) 14:17, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:18, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- I had given proper and resposible comments and citation before making any single edit. But I think you are failed to provide proper reason to make an edit or repeal any edits. I strongly condemned the way you posted comments on my talk page, your rude behaviour and your authority to do this is under question. Well I have seen your talk page and itself tells your misconduct and editwar against other users. Please read and learn Userconduct rules. After checking edit history of the article, It seems you have take self claimed responsibilty of the Rashtriya Swamsevak Sangh and you explicitly tried to justify your own perception about RSS, Darkness Shines what you think about the a subject is not only right, you must go by facts. Rather justifing self and falsify facts, I suggest you to change your own views and perceptions according to facts and truth.
If you agree or disagree for any changes made, you first should start a discussion on Article's talk page rather bullying other users. If this is repeated again, then i will assure you that you will be facing some consequences.
KLS 11:40, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
2002 Gujarat violence
Look, the stuff you are adding there does not belong, the 02' article is about the violence after the incident with the train, so we have but a short summary of the train incident and the article is about the violence which came after. The article is already to big, and going into details which belong on the other article is not needed. Darkness Shines (talk) 13:54, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Kswarrior, be very very careful when you make edits, I have seen good editors being blocked and banned when they make edits which do not go down well among majority editors. Try to get a concensus for your edits or atleast make a note on talk page. Also DS, you know it very well that 2002 Gujarat violenec also includes the attack on train, the violence is usually termed as post Godhra. ( You need not reply, I might not check for a long time).-sarvajna (talk) 15:33, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Notification
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This is a non administrator notification, and will be logged as such on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.