User talk:J Beake: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
dablink notification message (see the FAQ) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Welcome!== |
==Welcome!== |
||
Hi, J Beake. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our [[Wikipedia:Introduction|intro page]] contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit [[Wikipedia:Questions]], ask me on [[User talk:Richard Keatinge|my talk page]], or place '''<code><nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki></code>''' on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. [[User:Richard Keatinge|Richard Keatinge]] ([[User talk:Richard Keatinge|talk]]) 00:41, 2 January 2014 (UTC) |
Hi, J Beake. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our [[Wikipedia:Introduction|intro page]] contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit [[Wikipedia:Questions]], ask me on [[User talk:Richard Keatinge|my talk page]], or place '''<code><nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki></code>''' on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. [[User:Richard Keatinge|Richard Keatinge]] ([[User talk:Richard Keatinge|talk]]) 00:41, 2 January 2014 (UTC) |
||
== Anglo-Saxon settlement of Britain == |
|||
Hi, |
|||
I feel that we both want much the same thing to happen in regard to bringing this article into the 21st century, and making it a more coherent expression of current theories. However, from much past experience, some of it painful, making edits without attempting to reach some sort of consensus with other editors interested in the article often just ends in reversions and futile edit wars. It is usually far more advantageous to 'box clever', than to unilaterally make sweeping edits, however correct you think the edits are. [[User:Urselius|Urselius]] ([[User talk:Urselius|talk]]) 15:56, 3 January 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:Do you think you could leave some [[WP:ES|edit summaries]] to explain what you are doing? Most of your edits are self-explanatory, but [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anglo-Saxons&diff=595510011&oldid=595507688 this one], for instance, isn't, and some sort of explanation would be helpful. Thanks. [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 22:45, 14 February 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== History of England article == |
== History of England article == |
||
Hi -- [[History of England]] could use your attention. It's section on the Anglo-Saxon invasion links to Sub-Roman Britain but it should obviously link to the article on the Anglo-Saxon invasion and reflect that article in line with our guidance at [[WP:SUMMARY]]. It would be great if you could do this. Thanks. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 09:22, 29 January 2014 (UTC) |
Hi -- [[History of England]] could use your attention. It's section on the Anglo-Saxon invasion links to Sub-Roman Britain but it should obviously link to the article on the Anglo-Saxon invasion and reflect that article in line with our guidance at [[WP:SUMMARY]]. It would be great if you could do this. Thanks. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 09:22, 29 January 2014 (UTC) |
||
==Disambiguation link notification for February 10== |
|||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Anglo-Saxons]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Classical]] ([[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Anglo-Saxons|check to confirm]] | [[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Anglo-Saxons|fix with Dab solver]]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC) |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for February 22== |
|||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Anglo-Saxons]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Wulfstan]] ([[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Anglo-Saxons|check to confirm]] | [[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Anglo-Saxons|fix with Dab solver]]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 08:59, 22 February 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:21, 24 February 2014
Welcome!
Hi, J Beake. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Richard Keatinge (talk) 00:41, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
History of England article
Hi -- History of England could use your attention. It's section on the Anglo-Saxon invasion links to Sub-Roman Britain but it should obviously link to the article on the Anglo-Saxon invasion and reflect that article in line with our guidance at WP:SUMMARY. It would be great if you could do this. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 09:22, 29 January 2014 (UTC)