Jump to content

User talk:Philosopher.sam: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
General note: Removal of content, blanking on Sadhu Sundar Singh. (TW)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== February 2014 ==
== February 2014 ==
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Fycafterpro|Fycafterpro]]. I noticed that you recently removed some content from [[:Sadhu Sundar Singh]]&nbsp;without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[WP:Sandbox|sandbox]]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Fycafterpro|my talk page]]. Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> [[User:Fycafterpro|Fycafterpro]] ([[User talk:Fycafterpro|talk]]) 23:38, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Fycafterpro|Fycafterpro]]. I noticed that you recently removed some content from [[:Sadhu Sundar Singh]]&nbsp;without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[WP:Sandbox|sandbox]]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Fycafterpro|my talk page]]. Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> [[User:Fycafterpro|Fycafterpro]] ([[User talk:Fycafterpro|talk]]) 23:38, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I did remove some very damaging and largely basesless attackes on Sadhu Sundar Singh from a particular relgious perspective. Please review the text carefully. The entirely theme of that section is to claim that Sundar Singh was a heretic from a particular religious point of view. It is OK for someone to suggest he may have held views in tension with certain Christian traditions, but use language like "damning" is completely out of place in biographical entry like this. I will remove it again until it is revised by the original author in a non-biased way.

Latest revision as of 23:44, 24 February 2014

February 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Fycafterpro. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Sadhu Sundar Singh without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Fycafterpro (talk) 23:38, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I did remove some very damaging and largely basesless attackes on Sadhu Sundar Singh from a particular relgious perspective. Please review the text carefully. The entirely theme of that section is to claim that Sundar Singh was a heretic from a particular religious point of view. It is OK for someone to suggest he may have held views in tension with certain Christian traditions, but use language like "damning" is completely out of place in biographical entry like this. I will remove it again until it is revised by the original author in a non-biased way.