User talk:Falk Lieder: Difference between revisions
Falk Lieder (talk | contribs) |
Falk Lieder (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Welcome to [[Wikipedia]]. I have noticed that some of your recent [[genre]] changes, such as the one you made to [[:Fleshgod Apocalypse]], have conflicted with our [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]] and [[Wikipedia:verifiability|verifiability]] policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]] for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. [[User:MrMoustacheMM|MrMoustacheMM]] ([[User talk:MrMoustacheMM|talk]]) 02:42, 9 March 2014 (UTC) |
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Welcome to [[Wikipedia]]. I have noticed that some of your recent [[genre]] changes, such as the one you made to [[:Fleshgod Apocalypse]], have conflicted with our [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]] and [[Wikipedia:verifiability|verifiability]] policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]] for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. [[User:MrMoustacheMM|MrMoustacheMM]] ([[User talk:MrMoustacheMM|talk]]) 02:42, 9 March 2014 (UTC) |
||
Okay, that's a sensible policy. I thought you were just asking for a source so I added [[Neoclassical metal|this source]]. |
Okay, that's a sensible policy. I thought you were just asking for a source so I added [[Neoclassical metal|this source]]. Your comment suggests that you might have overlooked that I provided a source the second time. I certainly won't edit again without resolving the disagreement first. I don't feel strongly about this case and don't want to invest any more time into it. [[User:Falk Lieder|Falk]] ([[User talk:Falk Lieder#top|talk]]) 05:01, 9 March 2014 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 05:19, 9 March 2014
Welcome!
Hello, Falk Lieder, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! . To the EN-wiki. Lectonar 12:59, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Invitation to comment at Monty Hall problem RfC
You are invited to comment on the following probability-related RfC:
Talk:Monty Hall problem#Conditional or Simple solutions for the Monty Hall problem?
--Guy Macon (talk) 17:15, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to WP:COGSCI
Another welcome from WikiProject Cognitive science. Your help is appreciated! Kind regards, 㓟 (talk) 19:07, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
March 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Fleshgod Apocalypse, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 02:42, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Okay, that's a sensible policy. I thought you were just asking for a source so I added this source. Your comment suggests that you might have overlooked that I provided a source the second time. I certainly won't edit again without resolving the disagreement first. I don't feel strongly about this case and don't want to invest any more time into it. Falk (talk) 05:01, 9 March 2014 (UTC)