Talk:Ajax, Ontario: Difference between revisions
Living Conditions |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
The Living Conditions section is very biased. A better approach would be to discuss the challenges the town faces, similar to the section in the Whitby article. Any concerns? [[User:Daveharr|Daveharr]] 19:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC) |
The Living Conditions section is very biased. A better approach would be to discuss the challenges the town faces, similar to the section in the Whitby article. Any concerns? [[User:Daveharr|Daveharr]] 19:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC) |
||
I agree with this, this section of the article must be re-written. There needs to be a reputable source adding to this article, not someone who is prone to their own biases. The statement "police hellicopter [...] yet to prevent any crimes from occuring" particularly sticks out in my eyes, as this person has no proof what so ever that this has not been a useful tool in preventing crimes from occuring. This article definatley needs a look over. |
|||
Revision as of 01:41, 23 June 2006
sum 41 rules
Why does some loser keep deleting the famous people? Just because you don't know who it is, doesn't mean that everyone else in Ajax doesn't.
- Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability. Ardric47 03:02, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Living Conditions
The Living Conditions section is very biased. A better approach would be to discuss the challenges the town faces, similar to the section in the Whitby article. Any concerns? Daveharr 19:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
I agree with this, this section of the article must be re-written. There needs to be a reputable source adding to this article, not someone who is prone to their own biases. The statement "police hellicopter [...] yet to prevent any crimes from occuring" particularly sticks out in my eyes, as this person has no proof what so ever that this has not been a useful tool in preventing crimes from occuring. This article definatley needs a look over.