Talk:The Cricket on the Hearth: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
WP:NOVELS sort |
→Actual Publisher?: new section |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
''This notification is provided by a Bot'' --[[User:CommonsNotificationBot|CommonsNotificationBot]] ([[User talk:CommonsNotificationBot|talk]]) 15:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC) |
''This notification is provided by a Bot'' --[[User:CommonsNotificationBot|CommonsNotificationBot]] ([[User talk:CommonsNotificationBot|talk]]) 15:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC) |
||
|} |
|} |
||
== Actual Publisher? == |
|||
I have the impression that Chapman & Hall was actually the original publisher. (As is true with "A Christmas Carol" and "The Chimes." |
|||
Does anyone have any insight into this? |
Revision as of 01:50, 29 March 2014
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Bertha regains sight
Re: this line in the article:
- "It is suggested ambiguously that Bertha regains her sight at the end."
I looked and didn't see where this is. Any hints? Fothergill Volkensniff IV (talk) 03:41, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Commercial success
The article says:
- It was the best-selling of all five of the Christmas books. Its sale at the outset doubled that of both its predecessors.
This is contradicted by the Oxford Reader's Companion to Dickens which says:
- Although John Forster's claim that its sales "doubled" those of the Carol and Chimes is incorrect, reviews were generally favorable and it quickly went through two editions.."
I've removed from the article since it appears to be a common misconception. Fothergill Volkensniff IV (talk) 18:57, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
File:Cricketonthehearth front.jpg Nominated for Deletion
An image used in this article, File:Cricketonthehearth front.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Media without a source as of 28 June 2011
| |
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC) |
Actual Publisher?
I have the impression that Chapman & Hall was actually the original publisher. (As is true with "A Christmas Carol" and "The Chimes." Does anyone have any insight into this?
Categories:
- C-Class novel articles
- Mid-importance novel articles
- C-Class 19th century novels task force articles
- Unknown-importance 19th century novels task force articles
- WikiProject Novels articles
- C-Class Holidays articles
- Low-importance Holidays articles
- C-Class Christmas articles
- Mid-importance Christmas articles
- Christmas task force articles
- WikiProject Holidays articles
- C-Class Christianity articles
- Low-importance Christianity articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles