Jump to content

Talk:Open Library: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Igottheconch (talk | contribs)
Line 12: Line 12:


Can inline references from OpenLibrary be accepted as evidence that a publisher existed? Or should an article cite the books of the publisher instead?--[[User:Dthomsen8|DThomsen8]] ([[User talk:Dthomsen8|talk]]) 01:51, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Can inline references from OpenLibrary be accepted as evidence that a publisher existed? Or should an article cite the books of the publisher instead?--[[User:Dthomsen8|DThomsen8]] ([[User talk:Dthomsen8|talk]]) 01:51, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
==article about the legality of this site==
* [http://www.teleread.com/copy-right/the-internet-archives-open-library-is-violating-authors-copyrights/ The Internet Archive’s Open Library is violating authors’ copyrights] very relevant to this article. [[User:Igottheconch|Igottheconch]] ([[User talk:Igottheconch|talk]]) 21:48, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:48, 29 March 2014

Template

New Template:OL author. --Kolja21 (talk) 01:21, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Inline references from OpenLibrary

Can inline references from OpenLibrary be accepted as evidence that a publisher existed? Or should an article cite the books of the publisher instead?--DThomsen8 (talk) 01:51, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

article about the legality of this site