Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaka Fattah Jr.: Difference between revisions
→Chaka Fattah Jr.: revamped sentence structure |
Added my opinion on deletion and references |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{Find sources|Chaka Fattah Jr.}}) |
:({{Find sources|Chaka Fattah Jr.}}) |
||
As one of the most left winged inclusionist, I almost never nominate anything for AfD except when I see a blatant violation article such as this one. This is a glaring misuse of Wikipedia and is a [[WP:PROMO]], [[WP:SELFPROMOTE]], and [[WP:VANITY]] page. Despite the few sources which are obviously news, there is not a chance anyone would ever write an article on this person except himself or a close associate ([[WP:NOTNEWS]]). Zero accomplishments besides, from what I see as, an attempt to sue the IRS and claim harassment (very common occurrence). This article can be revisited if the outcome favors him, but until then this is absolutely trivial. All expansive edits were done by [[WP:SPA|SPAs]] and IP editors, can't see anything significant about his company either. The biographical information links to personal dropboxs (citations [1], [2], and [4]), clearly a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]]. It is regrettable that this person was able to get away with this for nearly six years. In fact he has been freeriding Wikipedia to make himself more notable and has pushed sources of himself up to the front page of search engines. This is the very thing we are trying to prevent so '''Speedy/Strong Delete''' and '''Salt''', obviously this person will try again. [[User:Valoem|<font color="DarkSlateGray">'''Valoem'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Valoem|'''<font color="blue">talk</font>''']]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Valoem|'''<font color="Green">contrib</font>''']]</sup> 08:15, 11 April 2014 (UTC) |
As one of the most left winged inclusionist, I almost never nominate anything for AfD except when I see a blatant violation article such as this one. This is a glaring misuse of Wikipedia and is a [[WP:PROMO]], [[WP:SELFPROMOTE]], and [[WP:VANITY]] page. Despite the few sources which are obviously news, there is not a chance anyone would ever write an article on this person except himself or a close associate ([[WP:NOTNEWS]]). Zero accomplishments besides, from what I see as, an attempt to sue the IRS and claim harassment (very common occurrence). This article can be revisited if the outcome favors him, but until then this is absolutely trivial. All expansive edits were done by [[WP:SPA|SPAs]] and IP editors, can't see anything significant about his company either. The biographical information links to personal dropboxs (citations [1], [2], and [4]), clearly a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]]. It is regrettable that this person was able to get away with this for nearly six years. In fact he has been freeriding Wikipedia to make himself more notable and has pushed sources of himself up to the front page of search engines. This is the very thing we are trying to prevent so '''Speedy/Strong Delete''' and '''Salt''', obviously this person will try again. [[User:Valoem|<font color="DarkSlateGray">'''Valoem'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Valoem|'''<font color="blue">talk</font>''']]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Valoem|'''<font color="Green">contrib</font>''']]</sup> 08:15, 11 April 2014 (UTC) |
||
All references are news, except 7 and 8, which appear to be opinion pieces. If the dropbox referenced pdf files [1], [2] are a violation of wikipedia policy on conflict of interest, they should be changed to the web version of the same news articles. See links, http://www.blackenterprise.com/mag/the-personal-touch/ & http://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/stories/2007/05/21/story13.html?page=all |
|||
It's not clear why Valoem believes this article was written by the article's subject. There is no way to determine if that is true, especially six years after creation. |
|||
Revision as of 11:56, 11 April 2014
- Chaka Fattah Jr. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As one of the most left winged inclusionist, I almost never nominate anything for AfD except when I see a blatant violation article such as this one. This is a glaring misuse of Wikipedia and is a WP:PROMO, WP:SELFPROMOTE, and WP:VANITY page. Despite the few sources which are obviously news, there is not a chance anyone would ever write an article on this person except himself or a close associate (WP:NOTNEWS). Zero accomplishments besides, from what I see as, an attempt to sue the IRS and claim harassment (very common occurrence). This article can be revisited if the outcome favors him, but until then this is absolutely trivial. All expansive edits were done by SPAs and IP editors, can't see anything significant about his company either. The biographical information links to personal dropboxs (citations [1], [2], and [4]), clearly a conflict of interest. It is regrettable that this person was able to get away with this for nearly six years. In fact he has been freeriding Wikipedia to make himself more notable and has pushed sources of himself up to the front page of search engines. This is the very thing we are trying to prevent so Speedy/Strong Delete and Salt, obviously this person will try again. Valoem talk contrib 08:15, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
All references are news, except 7 and 8, which appear to be opinion pieces. If the dropbox referenced pdf files [1], [2] are a violation of wikipedia policy on conflict of interest, they should be changed to the web version of the same news articles. See links, http://www.blackenterprise.com/mag/the-personal-touch/ & http://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/stories/2007/05/21/story13.html?page=all
It's not clear why Valoem believes this article was written by the article's subject. There is no way to determine if that is true, especially six years after creation.