User talk:Indiafriend

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Indiafriend (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I do not understand how I can be blocked for 'alleged' sockpuppetry. There was no checkuser investigation, there was no notification, and there is no evidence. Also, I do not understand how a few edits on a specific page justifies permission to block someone. Kww blocked me for doing research on a singer and expanding the article, and he is using sockpuppetry to justify this block. * Update. If it helps, this is my IP address "199.103.63.174". I would also like my case reviewed by someone other than Kww, Jayron32, or their peers. Their reviews are a pure conflict of interest. Kww and Jayron32 work together to validate my block. Still, there is no evidence linking myself to another editor. If in some weird this helps, I also have a facebook page.[[1]]

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I do not understand how I can be blocked for 'alleged' sockpuppetry. There was no checkuser investigation, there was no notification, and there is no evidence. Also, I do not understand how a few edits on a specific page justifies permission to block someone. Kww blocked me for doing research on a singer and expanding the article, and he is using sockpuppetry to justify this block. * Update. If it helps, this is my IP address "199.103.63.174". I would also like my case reviewed by someone other than Kww, Jayron32, or their peers. Their reviews are a pure conflict of interest. Kww and Jayron32 work together to validate my block. Still, there is no evidence linking myself to another editor. If in some weird this helps, I also have a facebook page.[[https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100008179690929]] |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I do not understand how I can be blocked for 'alleged' sockpuppetry. There was no checkuser investigation, there was no notification, and there is no evidence. Also, I do not understand how a few edits on a specific page justifies permission to block someone. Kww blocked me for doing research on a singer and expanding the article, and he is using sockpuppetry to justify this block. * Update. If it helps, this is my IP address "199.103.63.174". I would also like my case reviewed by someone other than Kww, Jayron32, or their peers. Their reviews are a pure conflict of interest. Kww and Jayron32 work together to validate my block. Still, there is no evidence linking myself to another editor. If in some weird this helps, I also have a facebook page.[[https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100008179690929]] |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I do not understand how I can be blocked for 'alleged' sockpuppetry. There was no checkuser investigation, there was no notification, and there is no evidence. Also, I do not understand how a few edits on a specific page justifies permission to block someone. Kww blocked me for doing research on a singer and expanding the article, and he is using sockpuppetry to justify this block. * Update. If it helps, this is my IP address "199.103.63.174". I would also like my case reviewed by someone other than Kww, Jayron32, or their peers. Their reviews are a pure conflict of interest. Kww and Jayron32 work together to validate my block. Still, there is no evidence linking myself to another editor. If in some weird this helps, I also have a facebook page.[[https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100008179690929]] |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

ignore the bad block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Indiafriend (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I do not understand how I can be blocked for 'alleged' sockpuppetry. There was no checkuser investigation, there was no notification, and there is no evidence. Also, I do not understand how a few edit on a specific page justifies permission to block someone. Kww blocked me for doing research on a singer and expanding the article, and he is using sockpuppetry to justify this block. * Update. If it helps, this is my IP address "199.103.63.174".

Decline reason:

Based on behavioral evidence, it is quite clear you are Soccermeko. Thanks for stopping by again. If you would like to be unblocked, log in as Soccermeko and request an unblock there. Jayron32 02:04, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.