Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reliance Globalcom: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
tag
Undid revision 608843770 by Coretheapple (talk) Not a "single-purpose account".
Line 15: Line 15:
*'''Comment''' Not sure who created the SPAs above (though I can guess), but they were apparently created for the purpose of disrupting this discussion. [[User:Coretheapple|Coretheapple]] ([[User talk:Coretheapple|talk]]) 15:04, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' Not sure who created the SPAs above (though I can guess), but they were apparently created for the purpose of disrupting this discussion. [[User:Coretheapple|Coretheapple]] ([[User talk:Coretheapple|talk]]) 15:04, 16 May 2014 (UTC)


*'''Keep'''. Seriously, Coretheapple... how about you drop the revenge editing based on wiki-stalking, grow up, and help us [http://www.bing.com/news/search?q=%22reliance+globalcom%22 So fix it]? - [[Special:Contributions/208.116.141.100|208.116.141.100]] ([[User talk:208.116.141.100|talk]]) 15:11, 16 May 2014 (UTC){{spa|208.116.141.100}}
*'''Keep'''. Seriously, Coretheapple... how about you drop the revenge editing based on wiki-stalking, grow up, and help us [http://www.bing.com/news/search?q=%22reliance+globalcom%22 So fix it]? - [[Special:Contributions/208.116.141.100|208.116.141.100]] ([[User talk:208.116.141.100|talk]]) 15:11, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:23, 16 May 2014

Reliance Globalcom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP. Sourced mainly to SEC filings, and without sufficient independent secondary sourcing so as to establish notability, Coretheapple (talk) 14:44, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]