Jump to content

Eidetic memory: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
undid incorrect change, apologies
Tag: Mobile edit
lead should talk about what it is, not make strong claims about another phenomenon. The distinction is made clear later in the article.
Line 1: Line 1:
{{About| the ability to perfectly recall images, sounds or objects|the TV show|Wogan's Perfect Recall|the video game developer|SCE Bend Studio|the 2011 documentary film|Photographic Memory (film)|}}
{{About| the ability to perfectly recall images, sounds or objects|the TV show|Wogan's Perfect Recall|the video game developer|SCE Bend Studio|the 2011 documentary film|Photographic Memory (film)|}}
'''Eidetic memory''' ({{IPAc-en|aɪ|ˈ|d|ɛ|t|ɪ|k|}}), often confused with the non-existent<ref>http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/i-developed-what-appears-to-be-a-ph/</ref><ref>http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2006/04/kaavya_syndrome.single.html</ref> '''photographic memory''' or '''total recall''', is an ability to recall images, sounds or objects in [[memory]] with high precision for a few minutes<ref>http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/180955/eidetic-image</ref><ref>http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=7176716</ref> without using [[mnemonic]]s. It occurs in a small number of children and is virtually non-existent in adults.<ref>http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/180955/eidetic-image</ref> The word ''eidetic'' comes from the Greek word [[wikt:ε δος|ε δος]] ({{IPA-el|êːdos|pron}}, ''[[eidos (philosophy)|eidos]]'', "seen").<ref name="AHD">{{cite web|url=http://www.bartleby.com/61/91/E0059100.html|title=Eidetic|work=[[American Heritage Dictionary]], 4th ed.|year=2000|accessdate=2007-12-12}}</ref>
'''Eidetic memory''' ({{IPAc-en|aɪ|ˈ|d|ɛ|t|ɪ|k|}}) is an ability to recall images, sounds or objects in [[memory]] with high precision for a few minutes<ref>http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/180955/eidetic-image</ref><ref>http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=7176716</ref> without using [[mnemonic]]s. It occurs in a small number of children and is virtually non-existent in adults.<ref>http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/180955/eidetic-image</ref> The word ''eidetic'' comes from the Greek word [[wikt:ε δος|ε δος]] ({{IPA-el|êːdos|pron}}, ''[[eidos (philosophy)|eidos]]'', "seen").<ref name="AHD">{{cite web|url=http://www.bartleby.com/61/91/E0059100.html|title=Eidetic|work=[[American Heritage Dictionary]], 4th ed.|year=2000|accessdate=2007-12-12}}</ref>


==Overview==
==Overview==

Revision as of 14:13, 4 June 2014

Eidetic memory (/ˈdɛtɪk/) is an ability to recall images, sounds or objects in memory with high precision for a few minutes[1][2] without using mnemonics. It occurs in a small number of children and is virtually non-existent in adults.[3] The word eidetic comes from the Greek word ε δος (pronounced [êːdos], eidos, "seen").[4]

Overview

Eidetic memory is the ability to recall images in great detail for several minutes. It is found in early childhood (between 2% and 10% of that age group) and is unconnected with the person's intelligence level. Like other memories, they are often subject to unintended alterations. The ability usually begins to fade after the age of six years, perhaps as growing vocal skills alter the memory process.[5][6]

Eidetic images are only available to a small percentage of children 6–12 years old, and are virtually nonexistent in adults. However, extensive research has failed to demonstrate consistent correlates between the presence of eidetic imagery and any cognitive, intellectual, neurological, or emotional measure.[7]

The popular culture concept of "photographic memory", where someone can briefly look at a page of text and then recite it perfectly from memory, is not the same as seeing eidetic images, and photographic memory has never been demonstrated to exist.[8][9]

A few adults have had phenomenal memories (not necessarily of images), but their abilities are also unconnected with their intelligence levels and tend to be highly specialized. In extreme cases, like those of Solomon Shereshevsky and Kim Peek, memory skills can reportedly hinder social skills.[10] Shereshevsky was a trained mnemonist, not a photographic memorizer, and there are no studies that confirm whether Kim Peek had true photographic memory.

Persons identified as having a condition known as Hyperthymesia (a.k.a., Highly Superior Autobiographical Memory or HSAM) are able to remember very intricate details of their own personal life, but this ability seems not to extend to other, non-autobiographical information.[11] People with hyperthymesia have vivid recollections of such minutiae as what shoes a stranger wore or what they ate and how they felt on a specific date many years in the past. In cases where HSAM has been identified and studied, patients under study may show significantly different patterns of MRI brain activity from other individuals, or even have differences in physical brain structure. Possibly because of these extraordinary abilities, certain individuals have difficulties in social interactions with others who have normal memories (only 2 of 55 in the US have successful marriages), and may additionally suffer from depression stemming from the inability to forget unpleasant memories and experiences from the past.[12] It has also been proposed that HSAM can be explained as a result of obsessive-compulsive thoughts about memories rather than "photographic memory".[13]

Skeptical views on photographic memory

The American cognitive scientist Marvin Minsky, in his book The Society of Mind (1988), considered reports of photographic memory to be an "unfounded myth".[14]

An example of extraordinary memory abilities being ascribed to photographic memory comes from the popular interpretations of Adriaan de Groot's classic experiments into the ability of chess Grandmasters to memorize complex positions of chess pieces on a chess board. Initially it was found that these experts could recall surprising amounts of information, far more than non-experts, suggesting eidetic skills. However, when the experts were presented with arrangements of chess pieces that could never occur in a game, their recall was no better than the non-experts, suggesting that they had developed an ability to organize certain types of information, rather than possessing innate eidetic ability.

Scientific skepticism about the existence of photographic memory was fueled around 1970 by Charles Stromeyer who studied his future wife Elizabeth, who claimed that she could recall poetry written in a foreign language that she did not understand years after she had first seen the poem. She also could, apparently, recall random dot patterns with such fidelity as to combine two patterns into a stereoscopic image.[15][16] She remains the only person documented to have passed such a test. However, the methodology of the testing procedures used is questionable (especially given the extraordinary nature of the claims being made)[17] as is the fact that the researcher married his subject, and that the tests have never been repeated (Elizabeth has consistently refused to repeat them)[18] raises further concerns.

Notable claims

Big Ben on a rainy evening in London, drawn entirely on the basis of memory by Stephen Wiltshire.

With the questionable exception of Elizabeth (discussed above), as of 2008, an article claims that of the people rigorously scientifically tested, no one claiming to have long-term eidetic memory has proven this ability.[18] There are a number of individuals with extraordinary memory who have been labeled eidetic, but many use mnemonics and other, non-eidetic memory enhancing exercises. Others have not been thoroughly tested.

See also

References

  1. ^ http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/180955/eidetic-image
  2. ^ http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=7176716
  3. ^ http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/180955/eidetic-image
  4. ^ "Eidetic". American Heritage Dictionary, 4th ed. 2000. Retrieved 2007-12-12.
  5. ^ Adams, William (1 March 2006). "The Truth About Photographic Memory". Psychology Today. Sussex Publishers. Retrieved 10 July 2013.
  6. ^ Searleman, Alan (12 March 2007). "Is there such a thing as a photographic memory? And if so, can it be learned?". Scientific American. Nature America. Retrieved 10 July 2013.
  7. ^ http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=7176716
  8. ^ http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/i-developed-what-appears-to-be-a-ph/
  9. ^ http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2006/04/kaavya_syndrome.single.html
  10. ^ Barber, Nigel (December 22, 2010). "Remembering everything? Memory searchers suffer from amnesia!". Psychology Today. Sussex. Retrieved July 10, 2013.
  11. ^ http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/quirks-memory/201301/people-extraordinary-autobiographical-memory
  12. ^ http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2013/12/18/255285479/when-memories-never-fade-the-past-can-poison-the-present
  13. ^ http://archive.wired.com/medtech/health/magazine/17-04/ff_perfectmemory?currentPage=all
  14. ^ Minsky, Marvin (1998). Society of Mind. Simon & Schuster. p. 153. ISBN 978-0-671-65713-0. ...we often hear about people with 'photographic memories' that enable them to quickly memorize all the fine details of a complicated picture or a page of text in a few seconds. So far as I can tell, all of these tales are unfounded myths, and only professional magicians or charlatans can produce such demonstrations.
  15. ^ Stromeyer, C. F., Psotka, J. (1970). "The detailed texture of eidetic images". Nature. 225 (5230): 346–349. doi:10.1038/225346a0. PMID 5411116.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  16. ^ Thomas, N.J.T. (2010). Other Quasi-Perceptual Phenomena. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  17. ^ Blakemore, C., Braddick, O., & Gregory, R.L. (1970). Detailed Texture of Eidetic Images: A Discussion. Nature, 226, 1267–1268.
  18. ^ a b Foer, Joshua (April 27, 2006). "Kaavya Syndrome: The accused Harvard plagiarist doesn't have a photographic memory. No one does". Slate. Retrieved December 16, 2012.