User talk:Sedamjedan: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:47, 6 June 2014

Userfied article

Welcome. As we discussed on my talk page, I have restored the deleted article to your user space at User:Sedamjedan/Amanda Eliasch. I have also restored the associated talk page to User talk:Sedamjedan/Amanda Eliasch because it contains a description of some concerns that should be addressed before re-submitting the article. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I can certainly see why it was deleted, but that's why we love Wikipedia. Spontaneous evolution and improvement.

follow up

I see that it has been restored in essentially identical form via articles for submission. This is not acceptable. As reviewing administrator, I have deleted that submission--the draft version remains for the time being in your user space. Do not submit it again without improvement DGG ( talk ) 04:57, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Major cleanup

Finally found some time to clean up all the mess and put it in order. Sedamjedan (talk) 19:19, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Tutelary (talk) 16:10, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

follow up

Hi Tutelary, the page was clean and fully referenced, the subject achieved quite many things and is a good artist, if we compare other living artists on Wikipedia, I believe this is harsh reaction without any written argument why is it G11. Please if you can do me a favor and enlight this beginner. :-) Sedamjedan (talk)

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 ==follow up==
 Hi Tutelary, the page was clean and fully referenced, the subject achieved quite many things and is a good artist, if we compare other living artists on Wikipedia, I believe this is harsh reaction without any written argument why is it G11. Please if you can do me a favor and enlight this beginner. :-) [[User:Sedamjedan|Sedamjedan]] ([[User talk:Sedamjedan#top|talk]])
-==[[:Amanda Eliasch]]==
-[[Image:Copyright-problem.svg|left|40px|alt=|link=]]
-This is an automated message from [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]].  I have performed a web search with the contents of [[:Amanda Eliasch]], and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.digplanet.com/wiki/Amanda_Eliasch.
-It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
-If substantial content is duplicated and it is not [[Wikipedia:Public domain|public domain]] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for the procedure.)<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-pageincludes--> [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 17:12, 6 June 2014 (UTC)