User talk:Studiokazuyo: Difference between revisions
Studiokazuyo (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Studiokazuyo (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Studiokazuyo|your contributions]]. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|general rule]], talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#FORUM|not general discussion]] about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting [[Wikipedia:Reference desk|our reference desk]] and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-chat1 --> -- [[User:Dsprc|<span style="color: purple">'''dsprc'''</span>]] [[User_talk:Dsprc|<span style="color: green"><sup>'''[talk]'''</sup></span>]] 05:19, 27 July 2014 (UTC) |
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Studiokazuyo|your contributions]]. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|general rule]], talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#FORUM|not general discussion]] about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting [[Wikipedia:Reference desk|our reference desk]] and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-chat1 --> -- [[User:Dsprc|<span style="color: purple">'''dsprc'''</span>]] [[User_talk:Dsprc|<span style="color: green"><sup>'''[talk]'''</sup></span>]] 05:19, 27 July 2014 (UTC) |
||
Thanks for your information about talk.I was able to edit the historical Nanking Massacre. However, I think it is frustrating that Nanking Massacre is all lie and you locked it so that no one can write over. You know my Chinese friends only read this wiki (no other books) and accused me therefore I looked into wiki page. It is not accurate you only reflect one side in the information page like wiki. Needs to be accurate not propaganda and for you to lock it so no one can edit is not very a civilized manner. |
Thanks for your information about talk.I was able to edit the historical Nanking Massacre. However, I think it is frustrating that Nanking Massacre is all lie and you locked it so that no one can write over. You know my Chinese friends only read this wiki (no other books) and accused me therefore I looked into wiki page. It is not accurate you only reflect one side in the information page like wiki. Needs to be accurate not propaganda and for you to lock it so no one can edit is not very a civilized manner. |
||
I have edited many time but goes back to the original. I am tired. I think some wired thing is going on. Wikipedia about Nanking is so much side of China if you read it it is ill fated and cannot even put the accurate information. Why??? What acheaves if it is lie. |
|||
Revision as of 00:44, 4 August 2014
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanking_Massacre The content is not accurate. Mostly lie. The photos are all fake. I think it is not the accurate history and should be revised ASAP. It is a propaganda of China and US.There were no Nanking Massacre we all know know.
July 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. -- dsprc [talk] 05:19, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your information about talk.I was able to edit the historical Nanking Massacre. However, I think it is frustrating that Nanking Massacre is all lie and you locked it so that no one can write over. You know my Chinese friends only read this wiki (no other books) and accused me therefore I looked into wiki page. It is not accurate you only reflect one side in the information page like wiki. Needs to be accurate not propaganda and for you to lock it so no one can edit is not very a civilized manner.
I have edited many time but goes back to the original. I am tired. I think some wired thing is going on. Wikipedia about Nanking is so much side of China if you read it it is ill fated and cannot even put the accurate information. Why??? What acheaves if it is lie.