Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HDGuard: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:28, 6 July 2006

HDGuard

Appears to be no more than an advertisement for the product. Parent company Eye4you is also being considered for deletion; both pages are primarily the work of the same user HumbleGod 06:23, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. An advertisement is not allowed.--Tdxi an g 07:23, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as ad. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 08:04, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Has anyone ever even heard of this software? The company is a small business that specialises in redistributing software developed by others. ~~I am unable to find any real info about them, and so their notability is dubious indeed.~~ Let me clarify this. I am able to verify their existence, but I was unable to verify that they have produced or distributed anything of note. --NMChico24 08:10, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, are you talking about 'Eye4you' the distributor, or 'Ramcke DatenTechnik GmbH' the developer? Kuru ^talk 19:31, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - The company I refer to is Eye4you. That is the company this article was associated with, as the same user who posted that article (since deleted) posted this one. --NMChico24 21:35, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Indeed, I am actually employed by the company eye4you, we do distribute HDGuard which in turn is somewhat of a competitor of Deep Freeze (Deep Freeze has little presence in Australia and Europe). I absolutely love wikipedia, and thought it may have been a good idea to post articles on our company which is well known throughout the Australian public/private education arena, however, after reading through the WP articles I do agree that both the HDGuard and eye4you articles should be removed. Notability doubts and corporate _influence_ are present, please delete this article. (Comment also posted on the Deep Freeze (software) AfD dispute.) Nathan.manzi 01:27, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 **'''Comment''', are you talking about 'Eye4you' the distributor, or 'Ramcke DatenTechnik GmbH' the developer? [[User:Kuru|<font color = "#cd853f">'''Kuru'''</font>]] [[User talk:Kuru|<font color = "#f5deb3"><sup>''talk''</sup></font>]] 19:31, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 ***The company I refer to is Eye4you.  That is the company this article was associated with, as the same user who posted that article (since deleted) posted this one.  --[[User:NMChico24|NMChico24]] 21:35, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
-*'''Comment''' - Indeed, I am actually employed by the company eye4you, we do distribute [[HDGuard]] which in turn is somewhat of a competitor of Deep Freeze (Deep Freeze has little presence in Australia and Europe). I absolutely love wikipedia, and thought it may have been a good idea to post articles on our company which is well known throughout the Australian public/private education arena, however, after reading through the WP articles I do agree that both the HDGuard and eye4you articles should be removed. Notability doubts and corporate _influence_ are present, and I think that this article shows signs of it also. (Comment also posted on the [[Deep Freeze (software)]] AfD dispute.) [[User:Nathan.manzi|Nathan.manzi]] 01:27, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
+*'''Comment''' - Indeed, I am actually employed by the company eye4you, we do distribute [[HDGuard]] which in turn is somewhat of a competitor of Deep Freeze (Deep Freeze has little presence in Australia and Europe). I absolutely love wikipedia, and thought it may have been a good idea to post articles on our company which is well known throughout the Australian public/private education arena, however, after reading through the WP articles I do agree that both the HDGuard and eye4you articles should be removed. Notability doubts and corporate _influence_ are present, please delete this article. (Comment also posted on the [[Deep Freeze (software)]] AfD dispute.) [[User:Nathan.manzi|Nathan.manzi]] 01:27, 6 July 2006 (UTC)