Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lonesome orchestra: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Relisting debate |
→Lonesome orchestra: My feedback |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{Find sources|Lonesome orchestra}}) |
:({{Find sources|Lonesome orchestra}}) |
||
There are no reliable sources to establish the notability. Google news search returns no hits [https://www.google.com/search?q=Lonesome+orchestra&oq=Lonesome+orchestra&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8#q=%22Lonesome+orchestra%22&safe=off&tbm=nws], and Google Books search also returns no hits [https://www.google.com/search?q=Lonesome+orchestra&oq=Lonesome+orchestra&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8#q=%22Lonesome+orchestra%22&safe=off&tbm=bks]. [[User:Vanjagenije|Vanjagenije]] ([[User talk:Vanjagenije|talk]]) 21:29, 8 September 2014 (UTC) |
There are no reliable sources to establish the notability. Google news search returns no hits [https://www.google.com/search?q=Lonesome+orchestra&oq=Lonesome+orchestra&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8#q=%22Lonesome+orchestra%22&safe=off&tbm=nws], and Google Books search also returns no hits [https://www.google.com/search?q=Lonesome+orchestra&oq=Lonesome+orchestra&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8#q=%22Lonesome+orchestra%22&safe=off&tbm=bks]. [[User:Vanjagenije|Vanjagenije]] ([[User talk:Vanjagenije|talk]]) 21:29, 8 September 2014 (UTC) |
||
I have updated the page with independent sources and hope and trust this will apply as reliable and relevant. Lonesome Orchestra is relevant internationally partly because of their work with The City of Prague Philharmonic. Kind regards, Arthur Kegels [[User:Arthur Kegels|Arthur Kegels]] ([[User talk:Arthur Kegels|talk]]) 07:31, 17 September 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Netherlands|list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:43, 9 September 2014 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Netherlands|list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:43, 9 September 2014 (UTC)</small> |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bands and musicians|list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:43, 9 September 2014 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bands and musicians|list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:43, 9 September 2014 (UTC)</small> |
Revision as of 07:31, 17 September 2014
- Lonesome orchestra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There are no reliable sources to establish the notability. Google news search returns no hits [1], and Google Books search also returns no hits [2]. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:29, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
I have updated the page with independent sources and hope and trust this will apply as reliable and relevant. Lonesome Orchestra is relevant internationally partly because of their work with The City of Prague Philharmonic. Kind regards, Arthur Kegels Arthur Kegels (talk) 07:31, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (warn) @ 19:50, 15 September 2014 (UTC)