Talk:Transformer oil: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:06, 30 September 2014

Electrical engineering Start‑class Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electrical engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electrical engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electrical engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Electrical engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Electrical engineeringelectrical engineering articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

how many type of insulating oil or transformer oil we used in 11 kv line?

Delete The coverage of the only source is promotional. Not notable — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pgarg78 (talk • contribs) 06:25, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

is usually a highly refined mineral oil

Reference or correction required. As noted further down in the article, Transformer oil is usually not mineral oil, and before that was PCB.

Edit request

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Transformer oil. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

That the repeated deletion of cited material be restored. The last revert was this edit and this should be reversed.

Evidence

The paragraph was already referenced, but has been deleted because of Wtshymanski's apparent superior knowledge which apparently is regarded as superior to the added cite. Wtshymanski claims that the low sulphur oil is exactly the same as the regular variety, but clearly removal of the sulphur makes it different. There is considerable material via Google that shows that the sulphur corrodes the copper windings, hence the problem this oil apparently solves. Google only brings up 39,000 odd hits on the matter. This is important and notable enough to be included in the article.

For those concerned that a manufacturer's paper is not impeccable enough, then this ER requests that this and this reference be either added or substituted as this comes from a much more impeccable source (University of Southampton and a transformer manufacturer respectively). I could add more references, but three should be more than adequate. 85.255.235.66 (talk) 13:06, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 Reference or correction required. As noted further down in the article, Transformer oil is usually not mineral oil, and before that was PCB.
+== Edit request ==
+{{edit semi-protected}}
+That the repeated deletion of cited material be restored.   The last revert was this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transformer_oil&diff=627630726&oldid=627570034 edit] and this should be reversed.
+===Evidence===
+The paragraph was already referenced, but has been deleted because of {{u|Wtshymanski}}'s apparent superior [[WP:OR|knowledge]] which apparently is regarded as superior to the added cite.  Wtshymanski claims that the low sulphur oil is exactly the same as the regular variety, but clearly removal of the sulphur makes it different.  There is considerable material via Google that shows that the sulphur corrodes the copper windings, hence the problem this oil apparently solves.  Google only brings up 39,000 odd hits on the matter.  This is important and notable enough to be included in the article.
+For those concerned that a manufacturer's paper is not impeccable enough, then this ER requests that [http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/273124 this] and [https://www.cee.siemens.com/web/at/de/energy/trafo-linz/home/Documents/Corrosive-sulfur-in-transformer-oil-EN.pdf this] reference be either added or substituted as this comes from a much more impeccable source (University of Southampton and a ''transformer'' manufacturer respectively).  I could add more references, but three should be more than adequate.  [[Special:Contributions/85.255.235.66|85.255.235.66]] ([[User talk:85.255.235.66|talk]]) 13:06, 30 September 2014 (UTC)