Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jayme K.: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Created page with ':({{Find sources|Jayme Karales}}) References are not valid, as it leads to blogs. Presumably identical article deleted (see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/...'
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
:({{Find sources|Jayme Karales}})
:({{Find sources|Jayme Karales}})
References are not valid, as it leads to blogs. Presumably identical article deleted (see [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jayme_Karales|here]]). I suspect the article was written by Jayme K himself (see [[Special:Contributions/BuffaloBillyBobThornton|author]], and 2 [[Special:Contributions/73.167.230.214|anonymous]] [[Special:Contributions/24.61.190.68|contributors]]). It's worth noting that 24.61.190.68 points to Massachusetts - where Jaymes K is from.
References are not valid, as it leads to blogs. Presumably identical article deleted (see [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jayme_Karales|here]]). I suspect the article was written by Jayme K himself (see [[Special:Contributions/BuffaloBillyBobThornton|author]], and 2 [[Special:Contributions/73.167.230.214|anonymous]] [[Special:Contributions/24.61.190.68|contributors]]). It's worth noting that 24.61.190.68 points to Massachusetts - where Jaymes K is from, and is also the IP of the only user to defend a previous identical article.

Furthermore, I removed explicitly self-promotional content which certainly proves that there is a [[Wikipedia:COI|conflict of interest]].

Revision as of 15:25, 16 October 2014

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References are not valid, as it leads to blogs. Presumably identical article deleted (see here). I suspect the article was written by Jayme K himself (see author, and 2 anonymous contributors). It's worth noting that 24.61.190.68 points to Massachusetts - where Jaymes K is from, and is also the IP of the only user to defend a previous identical article.

Furthermore, I removed explicitly self-promotional content which certainly proves that there is a conflict of interest.