Talk:Hi-Point Carbine 9 mm: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
→Merger: agree |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Merger== |
==Merger== |
||
I think that a single article would suffice for all the Hi-Point carbines; they're all similar enough in design. A single article with a breif overveiw and then specs on each model seems like it would be a lot more efficient. [[User:Fluzwup|scot]] 14:55, 1 May 2006 (UTC) |
I think that a single article would suffice for all the Hi-Point carbines; they're all similar enough in design. A single article with a breif overveiw and then specs on each model seems like it would be a lot more efficient. [[User:Fluzwup|scot]] 14:55, 1 May 2006 (UTC) |
||
Agreed... anyone else? This article needs a LOT of work, anyhow.... but I see no need for two of them... --<big>[[User:Vilerage|<font color="blue">негідний</font><font color="grey">лють</font>]]</big> <sup><small><font color="#0000ff">(</font>[[User_Talk:Vilerage|<font color="black">Reply</font>]]<font color="#ff0000">|</font>[[Special:Emailuser/Vilerage|<font color="black">Spam Me!</font>]]<strong>[[User:Vilerage/norealspamplease|<font color="#ff0000">*</font>]]</strong><font color="#0000ff">|[[User_talk:Vilerage/RfS|RfS]])</font></small></sup> 15:56, 11 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:56, 11 July 2006
How is this different from Hi-Point 995 Carbine?
Merger
I think that a single article would suffice for all the Hi-Point carbines; they're all similar enough in design. A single article with a breif overveiw and then specs on each model seems like it would be a lot more efficient. scot 14:55, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Agreed... anyone else? This article needs a LOT of work, anyhow.... but I see no need for two of them... --негіднийлють (Reply|Spam Me!*|RfS) 15:56, 11 July 2006 (UTC)