Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Kremlin Letter (plot): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 6: Line 6:
This is an extremely long synopsis (about 4500 words!), well beyond the [[WP:FILMPLOT]] recommended max. length (700). There is an attempt to justify this in [[Talk:The Kremlin Letter#Way too long]], but I don't buy it. [[User:Clarityfiend|Clarityfiend]] ([[User talk:Clarityfiend|talk]]) 06:56, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
This is an extremely long synopsis (about 4500 words!), well beyond the [[WP:FILMPLOT]] recommended max. length (700). There is an attempt to justify this in [[Talk:The Kremlin Letter#Way too long]], but I don't buy it. [[User:Clarityfiend|Clarityfiend]] ([[User talk:Clarityfiend|talk]]) 06:56, 21 November 2014 (UTC)


*'''Comment''' I'm not sure if a long synopsis warrants a deletion. The article could be could use some headings or some other improvements in the layout. [[User:Supersaiyen312|Supersaiyen312]] ([[User talk:Supersaiyen312|talk]]) 07:17, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' I'm not sure if a long synopsis warrants a deletion. The article could be could use some headings or some other improvements in the layout. But I agree that the article is way too long in the position that it is in. [[User:Supersaiyen312|Supersaiyen312]] ([[User talk:Supersaiyen312|talk]]) 07:17, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:22, 21 November 2014

The Kremlin Letter (plot) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an extremely long synopsis (about 4500 words!), well beyond the WP:FILMPLOT recommended max. length (700). There is an attempt to justify this in Talk:The Kremlin Letter#Way too long, but I don't buy it. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:56, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I'm not sure if a long synopsis warrants a deletion. The article could be could use some headings or some other improvements in the layout. But I agree that the article is way too long in the position that it is in. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 07:17, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]