User talk:Materialscientist: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 107.15.9.100 - "→confused: new section" |
→Ohh....: new section |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
this is a reply to the message you left me: That's horrible. Was what I added controversial? Couldn't you just add citation needed? <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/107.15.9.100|107.15.9.100]] ([[User talk:107.15.9.100|talk]]) 14:05, 29 November 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
this is a reply to the message you left me: That's horrible. Was what I added controversial? Couldn't you just add citation needed? <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/107.15.9.100|107.15.9.100]] ([[User talk:107.15.9.100|talk]]) 14:05, 29 November 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== Ohh.... == |
|||
Sorry I meant to edit the sentence below it.... |
|||
Thanks for letting me know!! |
Revision as of 19:28, 29 November 2014
{{talkback}}
template or quote the previous message.Nick Vujicic
Hi, Materialscientist. The previous protection was also three months. The same exact type of vandalism has persisted throughout this year on it... - Hoops gza (talk) 04:43, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
So, I fixed page about "kwoon" because it's wrong, I live in Beijing China, and speak Chinese, the character 馆 does not mean martial arts school, whoever wrote the article initially was seriously misinformed, I tried to correct the error, martial arts school is 武馆 wuguan, not 馆 guan, if you think I'm wrong feel free to take it upon yourself to learn Chinese — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.199.24.110 (talk) 11:55, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
also, if this is just because of my IP address it's because I'm using a VPN to get around Chinese web censorship — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.186.30.27 (talk) 12:01, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Citation for my recently removed addition to an entry.
I forgot to add the link to the material from which I derived the information that I added to the entry. Here is the link. I'll add the entry again, this time with the citation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.70.223.155 (talk) 18:14, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Need page move correction
An editor "Alanelpaso" seems to have made a good-intentioned page move/page creation that has messed with the page history. The original Page was The Motels. It has a long creation history. He moved it to The Motels Discography so it now has the history. He then deleted "The Motels" content and left only the discography content. he then re-created The Motels with the original content (minus the discography. LOL, I hope you can follow that. I need the new "The Motels" article deleted and I then need the "The Motels Discography" moved back to "The Motels". Then we can delete the changes he made and maybe create a new discography article. I hope I'm clear what he did. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:53, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
- Quickfixed, might need correction. Materialscientist (talk) 00:11, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'm not sure it needs a separate discography article, things get updated more when they are all together, but that's a minor issue that can be talked about now that you fixed things. Again thanks and happy black Friday. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
You have removed my reasonable and polite comment from your talk page, reverted my edits, bullied me with threats of an edit block, and misrepresented my views. Where do you get off pushing people around like this? What gives you the authority to determine which reasoning is valid, and which is invalid, solely based on your own whims? Spencergreenwood (talk) 10:06, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Psst, wanna buy a genuine fake famous brand wristwatch?
The would-be seller is eagerer than you might imagine. I've just now snuffed his double. Prepare for whack-a-mole. -- Hoary (talk) 13:50, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
confused
this is a reply to the message you left me: That's horrible. Was what I added controversial? Couldn't you just add citation needed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.15.9.100 (talk) 14:05, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Ohh....
Sorry I meant to edit the sentence below it.... Thanks for letting me know!!