Talk:Peter Pan Live!: Difference between revisions
Godofredo29 (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
::For something touted as "live!", recorded repeats (in any medium) have special (ironic) relevance -- and significant issues with how identical the content is. The source of the DVD info is the content of the broadcast itself, and can be readily verified. I have never seen any WP article that considered DVD info irrelevant...-[[Special:Contributions/71.174.175.150|71.174.175.150]] ([[User talk:71.174.175.150|talk]]) 14:43, 6 December 2014 (UTC) |
::For something touted as "live!", recorded repeats (in any medium) have special (ironic) relevance -- and significant issues with how identical the content is. The source of the DVD info is the content of the broadcast itself, and can be readily verified. I have never seen any WP article that considered DVD info irrelevant...-[[Special:Contributions/71.174.175.150|71.174.175.150]] ([[User talk:71.174.175.150|talk]]) 14:43, 6 December 2014 (UTC) |
||
:::What I'm saying is: the DVD info can be added, preferably sourced outside of viewing one on TV. But listing all the rebroadcast dates isn't necessary, hence the link. — '''[[User:CAWylie|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman;">Wylie</span>]][[User talk:CAWylie|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman;">pedia</span>]]''' 16:09, 7 December 2014 (UTC) |
:::What I'm saying is: the DVD info can be added, preferably sourced outside of viewing one on TV. But listing all the rebroadcast dates isn't necessary, hence the link. — '''[[User:CAWylie|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman;">Wylie</span>]][[User talk:CAWylie|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman;">pedia</span>]]''' 16:09, 7 December 2014 (UTC) |
||
==Peter Pan A Girl?== |
|||
I'm surprised the article doesn't address this at all. I know my grandson wants to know why Peter Pan is a girl. There can't be any rational explanation, but, rather, someone pushing an agenda that isn't part of the story.[[User:Godofredo29|Godofredo29]] ([[User talk:Godofredo29|talk]]) 02:19, 15 December 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:19, 15 December 2014
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Television Start‑class | |||||||||
|
Artwork, if appropriate to include
Thanks, ----Another Believer (Talk) 00:36, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Live?
How really live is this "Live!"? Assume a ten second delay to edit/censor disasters. And a full three hour delay for the West coast... Do they have stand-ins ready for all the parts, like normal theater productions? Haven't they already recorded the whole production, so that they can splice in bits as necessary? Will the West coast really see exactly what the East coast does, regardless of any problems that may occur? -71.174.175.150 (talk) 23:29, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
rebroadcast Sat 6dec14; DVD 16dec14
rebroadcast Sat 6dec14; DVD 16dec14 -71.174.175.150 (talk) 23:23, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- The DVD info can be added, when you find a source, but Wikipedia is not a TV guide. — Wyliepedia 06:08, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- For something touted as "live!", recorded repeats (in any medium) have special (ironic) relevance -- and significant issues with how identical the content is. The source of the DVD info is the content of the broadcast itself, and can be readily verified. I have never seen any WP article that considered DVD info irrelevant...-71.174.175.150 (talk) 14:43, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- What I'm saying is: the DVD info can be added, preferably sourced outside of viewing one on TV. But listing all the rebroadcast dates isn't necessary, hence the link. — Wyliepedia 16:09, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- For something touted as "live!", recorded repeats (in any medium) have special (ironic) relevance -- and significant issues with how identical the content is. The source of the DVD info is the content of the broadcast itself, and can be readily verified. I have never seen any WP article that considered DVD info irrelevant...-71.174.175.150 (talk) 14:43, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Peter Pan A Girl?
I'm surprised the article doesn't address this at all. I know my grandson wants to know why Peter Pan is a girl. There can't be any rational explanation, but, rather, someone pushing an agenda that isn't part of the story.Godofredo29 (talk) 02:19, 15 December 2014 (UTC)