Jump to content

Solo Parent: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:




Note regarding sabotage of this page and others with similar facts: Unfortunately, one wiki editor removed this page of factual information initially, and now is trying to hide the facts - regarding child custody and the ''[[Solo Parent]]'' title used by some governments - by recommending debates about merging these kinds of pages into large pages where these facts can become unnoticeable. If one wiki editor can do this at the top of the page, then it's also fair? that the page originator can respond here at the bottom.
Note regarding the sabotage of this page and others with similar facts: Unfortunately, one wiki editor removed this page of factual information initially, and now is trying to hide the facts - regarding child custody and the ''[[Solo Parent]]'' title used by some governments - by recommending debates about merging these kinds of pages into large pages where these facts can become unnoticeable. If one wiki editor can do this at the top of the page, then it's also fair? that the page originator can respond here at the bottom.

Revision as of 19:59, 22 December 2014

Solo Parent is the accurate title for a parent who is separated from the other parent and has taken the primary authority for the care of their children. The Philippines government laws use the title Solo Parent. [1] [2] The fact is, that after divorce, a person doesn't become "single" or "Miss" as some judges call "divorced women." The fact is that the title "single" makes a divorced person and a divorced family appear more appealing. Governments have known for decades of the tragic psychological damage to many children of solo parents, [3] but the U.S. government continues to increase the multiple billions of dollars every year in financial rewards to the state courts who increase solo parenting. [4] The New Zealand and Australian governments and the worldwide OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) use the title Sole Parent.[5] [6] [7] But "Sole Parent" has a deceptive appearance too, if the other parent is still alive. There is more information related to Solo Parent at Single parent and Sole custody.

References

  1. ^ "Solo Parent's Welfare Act and Parental Leave - The Philippines". Philippines government. March 3,2008. Retrieved December 22,2014. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help)
  2. ^ "An act providing for the benefits and privileges to Solo Parents and their children - Senate and House of Representatives of The Philippines (2000)". Philippines government. 2000. Retrieved December 22,2014. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  3. ^ "Statistics of Tragic Child Behavior Related to Parenting Time". EqualSharedParenting.com. 2014. Retrieved December 22,2014. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  4. ^ "Facts About the Support System". EqualSharedParenting.com. 2014. Retrieved December 22,2014. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  5. ^ "Sole Parent Support - New Zealand". Australian Government Department of Social Services. 2014. Retrieved December 22,2014. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  6. ^ "Social Change in Australian Families - May 2005" (PDF). newzealand.govtr.nz. May 2005. Retrieved December 22,2014. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  7. ^ "Sole parents, public policy, employment and poverty - 2011". OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2011. Retrieved December 22,2014. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)

See also


Note regarding the sabotage of this page and others with similar facts: Unfortunately, one wiki editor removed this page of factual information initially, and now is trying to hide the facts - regarding child custody and the Solo Parent title used by some governments - by recommending debates about merging these kinds of pages into large pages where these facts can become unnoticeable. If one wiki editor can do this at the top of the page, then it's also fair? that the page originator can respond here at the bottom.