Wikipedia:Training/For students/Training feedback: Difference between revisions
→~~~: new section |
→~~~: new section |
||
| Line 1,464: | Line 1,464: | ||
It was very helpful and found it a good aid to the reading. |
It was very helpful and found it a good aid to the reading. |
||
--[[User:Sej942|Sej942]] ([[User talk:Sej942|talk]]) 03:24, 20 January 2015 (UTC) |
--[[User:Sej942|Sej942]] ([[User talk:Sej942|talk]]) 03:24, 20 January 2015 (UTC) |
||
== [[User:Saw329|Saw329]] ([[User talk:Saw329|talk]]) == |
|||
;What I liked: The videos. |
|||
... |
|||
;What I didn't like: It would be nice to have this as a pdf for future reference (maybe this already exists somewhere?) |
|||
... |
|||
;What was missing: I can't think of anything. |
|||
... |
|||
;What was unnecessary: It was all good! |
|||
... |
|||
;If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? |
|||
... |
|||
--[[User:Saw329|Saw329]] ([[User talk:Saw329|talk]]) 05:07, 20 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 05:07, 20 January 2015
- What I liked
... The videos were useful
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
... More interactive tutorials
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I found it helpful --Anavimadumim15 (talk) 18:11, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Sohn.philip (talk) 00:35, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
It was easy to follow and the sections were clear, concise and not too long!
- What I didn't like
The tutorial videos and interactive features were not compatible with my tablet. Maybe work on that in the future?
- What was missing
How to stop an indent (i.e. I only want to indent the first sentence and leave the rest of the text normal)
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
On my PC, they were really useful!
--BChung2 (talk) 02:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--PeteLambert (talk) 21:30, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- The videos were very helpful. I followed the videos pausing along the way to edit my sandbox page
--Rahman437 (talk) 18:22, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
Videos teaching people how to edit an article.
- What I didn't like
More editing skills should be taught at the beginning, e.g. how to insert a picture.
- What was missing
How the editing icons work.
- What was unnecessary
None
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Did not try.
--Daamoy (talk) 05:02, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
It didn't take too long.
- What I didn't like
It was pretty un-stimulating.
- What was missing
Visual content.
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Evaregehr (talk) 05:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
Very detailed training module with good links to videos and tutorials that give a better explanation or allow the user to practice. I like the idea of 5 pillars because it is easy to remember and helps users to better understand what wikipedia is about and what it is not about and how to operate within wikipedia.
- What I didn't like
The videos didn't play until I opened them in youtube, the tutorial was a little frustrating if you accidentally closed it.
- What was missing
I think a better introduction to the coding structure that is used in writing wikipedia articles would be helpful.
- What was unnecessary
N/A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was easy to accidentally close the tutorial and I couldn't figure out how to make it re-launch without going back through the training and then starting the tutorial over. I liked that you could keep trying again until you got it right.
--Glasshn (talk) 22:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
The emphasis on a community effort and objectivity.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Helpful, since it displays what the end result should look like. There was a case where I made a mistake and was able to go back and fix it.
--Mr. Senfai (talk) 02:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Interactive modules
- What I didn't like
... Videos
- What was missing
... Nothing
- What was unnecessary
... Nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Easy to follow --Shawn.e.reilly (talk) 03:16, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Dvine16 (talk) 06:02, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
very comprehensive
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
pretty good
--ModestMoussorgsky (talk) 16:42, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
Interactive excercises, good step-by-step explanations
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
very helpful to understand wikipedia
--Vogel ant789 (talk) 21:43, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The video tutorials were extremely helpful!
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I really liked the interactive editorial tutorial and thought it was very helpful in teaching me how to make the edits. --Kaylynn Nelson (talk) 23:55, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Interactive videos, very cool and helpful
...
- What I didn't like
- Had some issues figuring out my sandbox vs the one that shows up in the toolbar at the top
...
- What was missing
- explanation of above issue
...
- What was unnecessary
- N/A
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Excellent!!
...
--Enarowski (talk) 01:05, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
The tutorial is very informational and in an organized fashion. ...
- What I didn't like
... Too long.
- What was missing
...I think there was a good mix of information and videos.
- What was unnecessary
... Too many slides.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Very helpful.
--24.34.157.125 (talk) 01:43, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
Learning how to upload images
- What I didn't like
How complicated it was
- What was missing
Nothing as far as i can tell
- What was unnecessary
None as far as I know
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I thought it was interesting
--Attt7 (talk) 07:42, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--VariedEye (talk) 07:43, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Simple and easy to understand.
- What I didn't like
...Nothing
- What was missing
...More practices for editing.
- What was unnecessary
...Some initial pages per module.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I did not try the interactive editing tutorial yet.
--Delval11 (talk) 14:16, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Very informative, easy to follow
- What I didn't like
...N/A
- What was missing
...More practice
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It was great
--Nucomm23 (talk) 15:54, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Harris.qureshi (talk) 21:07, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Easy to click through and use, liked the tutorials more than the reading.
- What I didn't like
...A little bit too much wordy information in it at the end, keep that near the beginning.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...very very helpful!
--Alexa cotton (talk) 00:11, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
- I liked the interactive portions using the sandbox
...
- What I didn't like
- some instructions had too much text
...
- What was missing
- maybe moving images that shows you what you need to do for certain applications instead of boring text
...
- What was unnecessary
- nothing really
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was fun, there needs to be more of it!
...
--Davidk94 (talk) 05:31, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
Videos are helpful
- What I didn't like
Nothing
- What was missing
How to edit a template
- What was unnecessary
Nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Not tried
--Cliff310 (talk) 12:53, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I liked the step-by-step walk through to practice formatting. I also liked that the steps were clear, concise, and had video demonstrations where a visual adds value.
- What I didn't like
... There wasn't anything that I didn't like.
- What was missing
... I would have liked to practice using the sandbox to create a new page vs edit an existing page and how to link it to the original so that other contributors can follow what is going on. I found that portion unclear. However, once I get going with it on my own, I'm sure I will be able to figure it out.
- What was unnecessary
... I thought it was clear and to the point.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I thought it was useful.
--pharmerJAL (talk) 20:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
... informative, easy to get through and helped me understand a lot more of how wikipedia is created and worked on
- What I didn't like
... Some of the videos are annoying. Also, it gets confusing towards the end with editing and different levels of changing you can create
- What was missing
... I would've liked to have seen more in-depth creating and editing tools, as well as an easier way to find this page in the first place- I needed a link from my instructor, and couldn't find it when I created an account on the site originally.
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Really excellent idea, please continue to work on it and make it more available for different features
--Meg.jacoby (talk) 21:29, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked the simplicity of the explanations.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Makibolas (talk) 21:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
The tutorial is clear and thorough. The practice pages are particularly helpful.
- What I didn't like
Wikipedia clearly privileges current contributors over new editors.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
The interactive editing tutorial provides a firm introduction to Wikipedia editing.
--SLbaker29 (talk) 22:10, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Very simple and straight forward.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I did not, but I will.
--Aluisbarron (talk) 22:13, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--DominicValencia (talk) 22:20, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Great descriptions on how to avoid getting banned from wikipedia.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
... References to Steven Colberts hostile takeover of wikipedia
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Npsanchez (talk) 22:21, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Alneal21 (talk) 22:29, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Kbranson44 (talk) 22:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Andrewshuta (talk) 22:32, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--MccBraun (talk) 23:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I enjoyed the tutorial sections, it helped being directed to steps so I could duplicate them later.
- What I didn't like
...The videos weren't as helpful, I would have liked diagrams better.
- What was missing
...Diagrams
- What was unnecessary
...I can't really remember anything I thought was unneccessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I liked it.
--Lexaabdalla (talk) 00:08, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Smadams1 (talk) 00:34, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
- It was really helpful.
...
- What I didn't like
- Nothing.
...
- What was missing
- Nothing.
...
- What was unnecessary
- Nothing.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I thought it was really useful.
...
--Nickkuvaas (talk) 01:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
... concision, interactive tutorial.
- What I didn't like
...I couldn't get the firework noise to go away after I closed the pop-up and it started to give me a headache before I resorted to refreshing the page.
- What was missing
...more demonstrative videos
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...a little wonky, but definitely helpful
--Kerhodes (talk) 01:48, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I liked the tutorials and the step by step instruction.
- What I didn't like
... The tutorials didn't open in a separate window and I sometimes found it hard to get back to the tutorial.
- What was missing
... More about the community and why they contribute. Maybe more about the history of Wikipedia.
- What was unnecessary
...x
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I thought it was helpful but could have been better if it opened in another window.
--BrieShell47 (talk) 02:40, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Djcercon (talk) 02:55, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The videos were clear and concise.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Vrodio14 (talk) 03:26, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--AnthonyCallisto (talk) 15:04, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
The videos are very helpful in illustrating the features.
- What I didn't like
The interactive tutorials are a bit confusing. I was lost sometimes and it kept on asking me to do the same thing that I had just completed.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I said this in "What I didn't like"
--Wilzzw (talk) 20:44, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
- It was very clear
...
- What I didn't like
- It was very long
...
- What was missing
- Nothing
...
- What was unnecessary
- Quite detailed
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Rolandcharlotte (talk) 23:04, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Clear instructions
- What I didn't like
...N/A
- What was missing
... Maybe add quizzes at the end of it
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It was very clear
--209.42.107.20 (talk) 00:16, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
The tutorials
- What I didn't like
- What was missing
I don't know yet
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was great
--LacMJ (talk) 01:51, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
The interactive videos and links that allowed me to try editing while listening to the tutorial.
- What I didn't like
Nothing! It was very informative!
- What was missing
N/A
- What was unnecessary
N/A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Very helpful and allowed me to actually practice the many techniques I was learning about.
--Jretrum (talk) 16:49, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
the videos & the sandbox tutorials helped. ...
- What I didn't like
the "happy editing" at the end of every video. ...
- What was missing
N/A ...
- What was unnecessary
the "happy editin" thing again. ...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I thought it was very helpful since I have no prior knowledge on how to code. ...
--Ags36 (talk) 20:06, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...It was very easy to understand.
- What I didn't like
...There was nothing that I did not like.
- What was missing
...Nothing that I can think of. It was pretty comprehensive for a beginner's tutorial.
- What was unnecessary
...Nothing.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It was helpful to have step-by-step instructions.
--CiKay (talk) 21:44, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
I liked the interactivity provided. ...
- What I didn't like
I did not like the structure of the modules. ...
- What was missing
It was not visually appealing. ...
- What was unnecessary
Nothing. ...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was very useful however the tutorial should open in a new tab, not replace the tab you're on. ...
--Woode2 (talk) 19:51, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
It was very interactive and welcoming - good intro!
- What I didn't like
Nada!
- What was missing
Nada, short, sweet and to the point!
- What was unnecessary
Nada
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Was only slightly glitchy, but overall good, lots of fun almost like a game --Mantareina (talk) 22:10, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
... the short videos that were extremely helpful.
- What I didn't like
... the training got a little dry at the end.
- What was missing
... more about the sandbox and talk pages.
- What was unnecessary
... the WikiLove.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Meganrose99 (talk) 23:36, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
- I enjoyed the video accompaniment on some of the more confusing topics.
...
- What I didn't like
- I think there should be more tutorials.
...
- What was missing
- Tutorials
...
- What was unnecessary
- Nothing was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I really liked it! It helped, and there should be more of them for more advanced editing procedures.
...
--Hmerickson (talk) 00:30, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The videos are very helpful in guiding the viewer.
- What I didn't like
...The written explanations were a little confusing until watching the videos.
- What was missing
...Nothing
- What was unnecessary
...Nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Annhagner (talk) 15:57, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
informative guidelines
- What I didn't like
nothing
- What was missing
a bit more detail when describing how to cite
- What was unnecessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
helpful because of the step-by-step pop ups as I edited. --Miguelmabilangan (talk) 16:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--CateNicole (talk) 18:32, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Gchang92 (talk) 20:31, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Interactive
...
- What I didn't like
- intimidating
...
- What was missing
- nothing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Mentor321 (talk) 21:30, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Jlgriffin (talk) 22:58, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...straightforward
- What I didn't like
...basic
- What was missing
...depth/scope of development
- What was unnecessary
...repetitive elements/common knowledge
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...could be more user friendly
--JonathonTWeber41 (talk) 01:44, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Nwells1229 (talk) 04:18, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Easy navigation, was able to take notes as I went along
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...I didn't watch all the videos
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...Useful for future projects
--Ml13253 (talk) 17:45, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
... It went through the basics very well and comprehensively.
- What I didn't like
... It was lengthy, and I was unable to save my progress, or it was not clear how to save my progress
- What was missing
... I am not aware of anything that's missing.
- What was unnecessary
... no comment.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... It was useful
--D.jae.lee (talk) 18:00, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...It is easily formatted in terms of what is taught when. The flow was good and the tutorials are very helpful.
- What I didn't like
...In a few instances the tutorial bubbles were not totally clear.
- What was missing
...Nothing that I know of.
- What was unnecessary
...I feel some of the long wordy lists can be covered by a short video.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It was very helpful but sometimes everything was not 100% clear.
--Tschn012 (talk) 18:22, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Jecorlet (talk) 21:10, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
It was really straightforward
- What I didn't like
layout
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
some of the advanced stuff
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
really good! comprehensive and good pointers to where we can find things!
--Lbaronikian (talk) 21:12, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Lbaronikian (talk) 21:20, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
Quick and to the point orientation
- What I didn't like
Could be a more interactive editing option
- What was missing
- What was unnecessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Needs to be developed further --AAPhysiology (talk) 21:34, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The videos and interactive tutorial
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I liked being able to try things first hand and not just read how to do it.
--NealeyS (talk) 22:21, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The videos were very helpful!
...
- What I didn't like
- I think it's a bit overwhelming, so I think there should be a very basic intro training for editing, and then an advanced training for Talking, Watching, etc. That way the user could get all of the basics first without feeling swamped!
...
- What was missing
- In the section on adding photos, the only example given was for one's own work. Given that most people use reproduced images that are not their own, I think it would be more helpful to have the tutorial based on that option.
...
- What was unnecessary
- WikiLove...I don't think it's necessary for beginners!
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Super helpful!
...
--Abbeykobrien (talk) 22:26, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--DieDemokratieimmer (talk) 22:49, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The simplicity of the tutorial videos
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Steparaptor (talk) 23:01, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Easy to follow and no unnecessary information was in each of the sections. The videos that were linked were also helpful especially for a visual of what to do.
- What I didn't like
...That when explaining in the videos it sounded very robotic. Also there could be more visuals such as pictures
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It was helpful to try out what was being taught right then and there instead of reading about it and trying it out later only to find out you really don't know how to do it. It was also very easy to follow because the instructions that would pop up would be close to where the editing was taking place.
--Lokazaki0326 (talk) 23:50, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Easy to follow and no unnecessary information was in each of the sections. The videos that were linked were also helpful especially for a visual of what to do.
- What I didn't like
...That when explaining in the videos it sounded very robotic. Also there could be more visuals such as pictures
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It was helpful to try out what was being taught right then and there instead of reading about it and trying it out later only to find out you really don't know how to do it. It was also very easy to follow because the instructions that would pop up would be close to where the editing was taking place.
--Lokazaki0326 (talk) 23:50, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
It was a very informative...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Laurasweil (talk) 23:53, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
The interactive training was incredibly helpful to learn how to make basic edits to Wikipedia.
- What I didn't like
When you click on a link, it should automatically take you to a new tab so as not to lose your spot in the training.
- What was missing
Is there a way to undo an edit if you make a mistake?
- What was unnecessary
Some of the videos explained exactly what was said in the previous text.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was very helpful and found it a good aid to the reading. --Sej942 (talk) 03:24, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The videos.
...
- What I didn't like
- It would be nice to have this as a pdf for future reference (maybe this already exists somewhere?)
...
- What was missing
- I can't think of anything.
...
- What was unnecessary
- It was all good!
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...