User talk:General Ization

PLEASE READ

If I have nominated your article for deletion, removed your content or reverted your change and you would like to know why,
please review the following Wikipedia policies and guidelines, among others that may be mentioned in a message I left on your Talk page:

• WP:N (General Notability)
• WP:BIO (Person Notability)
• WP:ORG (Company or Group Notability)
• WP:WEB (Web Content Notability)

• WP:MUSIC (Musician or Band Notability)
• WP:V (Verifiability)
• WP:RS (Reliable Sources)
• WP:COPY (Copyright)

If none of these pages addresses your concerns,
you can leave me a note.
If you do, please sign and date your post by typing four tildes: ~~~~.

If you can't be bothered to do any of this, please do not post on my page.

exists

hmm, I have seen it before it was taken down, I do not think it is something that needs resurrecting, imho, I am sure there is a policy regarding photos of murdered children... However in this fraught environment, its your call, I do not think I am going to get into online discussion further regarding this issue. Other than that, good on your editing! satusuro 02:03, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

I agree it is graphic, and perhaps another editor will present a Wikipedia policy that requires it be removed. I know of none myself, and think it is helpful to the process of accurately describing his recent statements there and his general state of mind. Dwpaul ^Talk 02:05, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Not. so better I leave it at that. It is not wikipedias role to perpetuate crap. the terrorism in australia article is currently trying to do that, the people who know are repeatedly saying it is a lone looney and every editor is trying to turn it into something it wasnt. I am taking a break from this stuff, it simply shows how something is black, people are trying to say it is blue. enough. satusuro 02:09, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Re: comments

I hope this doesn't count for vandalism because I am new to Wikipedia and I saw comments and I just started typing anyway this is why u have been receiving vandalism my cousin was playing on my phone, I went to go use the bathroom and I came back upstairs and she was editing your page I wanted to change it back to its old form but I didn't know what it used to look like. Sorry and I hope you understand. But I looked on my page and I saw that you edited my page will you please explain to me why you get to edit my page without getting in trouble. Thank you!

I must say that given your editing history I'm surprised that you seem to not understand why this would be out of scope here.

Be surprised all you want, but the next time you engage in an ad hominem like that I'll take you to task for incivility. Just because I disagree with you does not mean I don't understand the scope. And I have no idea what my editing history has to do with this. Viriditas (talk) 04:03, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

That wasn't an ad hominem attack, and no reasonable person would think it was. It was a sincere statement of surprise of exactly what I said surprised me, and I am entitled to be surprised about anything I like, and to mention it, thank you very much. Dwpaul ^Talk 04:07, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

And yet, you still can't explain what you meant by it; meanwhile, you appealed to the person and changed the subject, which falls along the lines of an ad hominem. I said, "this subject is within the scope of the article". You replied with, "look at your editing history, I can't believe you would say that". You went ad hominem, and clearly you aren't honest enough to admit it. Viriditas (talk) 04:13, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Oh, I can easily explain what I meant by it, but it is clear that it would be a waste of my time. I can tell you, as I already did, that it was not an ad hominem attack.Dwpaul ^Talk 04:15, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

It would be a waste of your time, because at this point, I have serious questions about your honesty. Viriditas (talk) 04:16, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Now that is the overture to an ad hominem attack. Do what you like, bring it up at WP:AN/I if you like, but please depart from my Talk page. Dwpaul ^Talk 04:18, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Really? You can be surprised about my position based on my edit history, but I can't question your honesty? Hypocrite. Viriditas (talk) 04:28, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!!!

E-e-bayer_lover (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

And remember to keep the CHRIST in CHRISTmas! — Preceding unsigned comment added by E-e-bayer lover (talk • contribs) 22:25, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Incredibles content deletion

Hi, I know that there were some items available at the Disney shop in London in 2004. These articles are no longer available from the shop but I know they exist because I bought them there and still have them. I cannot find any reference to them anywhere on the internet. I do not know how to verify their existence because they are no longer available. Is there a way to verify them. Thankyou. Alanberris (talk) 22:15, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

• Please see WP:V (Verifiability). The fact that you are sure they exist does not make you a reliable source for the information in a Wikipedia article. If there is no reliable source, then the information can not be published here. Dwpaul ^Talk 00:29, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

According to Wikipedia rules, the article (two short sentences) is subjected to deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldenass (talk • contribs) 02:38, 17 February 2015 (UTC)