Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Igorrr: Difference between revisions
Added my two cents, stating why I think Igorrr is a notable artist and deserves its own Wikipedia page. |
Mpolkiujhy (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
To me, Igorrr is a notable artist/band. According to the [[Wikipedia:Notability_(music)|notability criteria]] for music: Igorrr has four albums on Ad Noiseam, a 12-year old label with a roster containing tens of artists and bands who seem to deserve their own Wikipedia pages, which meets criterion 5 in the list: "Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable)." A simple Google search gives hundreds of albums reviews and interviews by independent media, including renowned websites, French and international. Here is a list [http://www.facebook.com/notes/igorrr/online-press-hallelujah/10151220601778049 of reviews and interviews for his 2012 "Halleluyah" album alone]. [[Special:Contributions/85.171.44.43|85.171.44.43]] ([[User talk:85.171.44.43|talk]]) 10:37, 19 February 2015 (UTC) |
To me, Igorrr is a notable artist/band. According to the [[Wikipedia:Notability_(music)|notability criteria]] for music: Igorrr has four albums on Ad Noiseam, a 12-year old label with a roster containing tens of artists and bands who seem to deserve their own Wikipedia pages, which meets criterion 5 in the list: "Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable)." A simple Google search gives hundreds of albums reviews and interviews by independent media, including renowned websites, French and international. Here is a list [http://www.facebook.com/notes/igorrr/online-press-hallelujah/10151220601778049 of reviews and interviews for his 2012 "Halleluyah" album alone]. [[Special:Contributions/85.171.44.43|85.171.44.43]] ([[User talk:85.171.44.43|talk]]) 10:37, 19 February 2015 (UTC) |
||
I completely agree, this is nothing more than respecting the Wikipedia's terms. |
|||
I wrote a more complete article here, contesting the deletion of the Igorrr page : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Aeternus |
|||
David. |
|||
Revision as of 11:21, 19 February 2015
- Igorrr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability; fails WP:GNG and WP:NMG. Λeternus (talk) 18:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
To me, Igorrr is a notable artist/band. According to the notability criteria for music: Igorrr has four albums on Ad Noiseam, a 12-year old label with a roster containing tens of artists and bands who seem to deserve their own Wikipedia pages, which meets criterion 5 in the list: "Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable)." A simple Google search gives hundreds of albums reviews and interviews by independent media, including renowned websites, French and international. Here is a list of reviews and interviews for his 2012 "Halleluyah" album alone. 85.171.44.43 (talk) 10:37, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
I completely agree, this is nothing more than respecting the Wikipedia's terms. I wrote a more complete article here, contesting the deletion of the Igorrr page : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Aeternus David.