Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ad Noiseam: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by Mpolkiujhy - "" |
Mpolkiujhy (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Just my 2 cents : there are tens of Ad Noiseam artists who have their Wikipedia page, and it seems that the whole team finds it "relevant" and "notable", because these pages still exist and no one has talked about deleting them recently. Why would their label be irrelevant or unnotable? I try to understand. [[Special:Contributions/85.171.44.43|85.171.44.43]] ([[User talk:85.171.44.43|talk]]) 10:24, 19 February 2015 (UTC) |
Just my 2 cents : there are tens of Ad Noiseam artists who have their Wikipedia page, and it seems that the whole team finds it "relevant" and "notable", because these pages still exist and no one has talked about deleting them recently. Why would their label be irrelevant or unnotable? I try to understand. [[Special:Contributions/85.171.44.43|85.171.44.43]] ([[User talk:85.171.44.43|talk]]) 10:24, 19 February 2015 (UTC) |
||
Ad Noiseam has revealed so many noticeable artists, and has released so many high quality releases (184 today to be exact) that its place is evident here, in an informative site that everyone |
Ad Noiseam has revealed so many noticeable artists, and has released so many high quality releases (184 today to be exact) that its place is evident here, in an informative site that everyone reads. David. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Mpolkiujhy|Mpolkiujhy]] ([[User talk:Mpolkiujhy|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mpolkiujhy|contribs]]) 11:16, 19 February 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
Revision as of 11:22, 19 February 2015
- Ad Noiseam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability. Λeternus (talk) 18:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Just my 2 cents : there are tens of Ad Noiseam artists who have their Wikipedia page, and it seems that the whole team finds it "relevant" and "notable", because these pages still exist and no one has talked about deleting them recently. Why would their label be irrelevant or unnotable? I try to understand. 85.171.44.43 (talk) 10:24, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Ad Noiseam has revealed so many noticeable artists, and has released so many high quality releases (184 today to be exact) that its place is evident here, in an informative site that everyone reads. David. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpolkiujhy (talk • contribs) 11:16, 19 February 2015 (UTC)