Jump to content

Talk:Landau's algorithm: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
add math
Line 9: Line 9:
Is there a reason for having this article separate from [[nested radicals]]? It is one sentence long and says nothing that that article doesn't say, including references. Maybe if someone wants to someday make a good article for the algorithm, it should be separate, but right now it has nothing.
Is there a reason for having this article separate from [[nested radicals]]? It is one sentence long and says nothing that that article doesn't say, including references. Maybe if someone wants to someday make a good article for the algorithm, it should be separate, but right now it has nothing.
<font color="#008888">[[User:Asmeurer|Asmeurer]] ([[User talk:Asmeurer|talk]] ♬ [[Special:Contributions/Asmeurer|contribs]])</font> 21:05, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
<font color="#008888">[[User:Asmeurer|Asmeurer]] ([[User talk:Asmeurer|talk]] ♬ [[Special:Contributions/Asmeurer|contribs]])</font> 21:05, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
: It's totally daft, I agree. [[Special:Contributions/86.127.138.234|86.127.138.234]] ([[User talk:86.127.138.234|talk]]) 08:03, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:03, 27 February 2015

WikiProject iconMathematics Redirect‑class Low‑priority
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis redirect has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Purpose of this article

Is there a reason for having this article separate from nested radicals? It is one sentence long and says nothing that that article doesn't say, including references. Maybe if someone wants to someday make a good article for the algorithm, it should be separate, but right now it has nothing. Asmeurer (talkcontribs) 21:05, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's totally daft, I agree. 86.127.138.234 (talk) 08:03, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]