Talk:Landau's algorithm: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
add math |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Is there a reason for having this article separate from [[nested radicals]]? It is one sentence long and says nothing that that article doesn't say, including references. Maybe if someone wants to someday make a good article for the algorithm, it should be separate, but right now it has nothing. |
Is there a reason for having this article separate from [[nested radicals]]? It is one sentence long and says nothing that that article doesn't say, including references. Maybe if someone wants to someday make a good article for the algorithm, it should be separate, but right now it has nothing. |
||
<font color="#008888">[[User:Asmeurer|Asmeurer]] ([[User talk:Asmeurer|talk]] ♬ [[Special:Contributions/Asmeurer|contribs]])</font> 21:05, 27 November 2009 (UTC) |
<font color="#008888">[[User:Asmeurer|Asmeurer]] ([[User talk:Asmeurer|talk]] ♬ [[Special:Contributions/Asmeurer|contribs]])</font> 21:05, 27 November 2009 (UTC) |
||
: It's totally daft, I agree. [[Special:Contributions/86.127.138.234|86.127.138.234]] ([[User talk:86.127.138.234|talk]]) 08:03, 27 February 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:03, 27 February 2015
![]() | Mathematics Redirect‑class Low‑priority | |||||||||
|
Purpose of this article
Is there a reason for having this article separate from nested radicals? It is one sentence long and says nothing that that article doesn't say, including references. Maybe if someone wants to someday make a good article for the algorithm, it should be separate, but right now it has nothing. Asmeurer (talk ♬ contribs) 21:05, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
- It's totally daft, I agree. 86.127.138.234 (talk) 08:03, 27 February 2015 (UTC)