Talk:Scholarism: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 216.246.232.41 - "" |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Weasel quotes == |
== Weasel quotes == |
||
"Scholarism is considered "extremist" -- Putting that in quotes suggests bias. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/216.246.232.41|216.246.232.41]] ([[User talk:216.246.232.41|talk]]) 00:18, 3 February 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
"Scholarism is considered "extremist" -- Putting that in quotes suggests bias. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/216.246.232.41|216.246.232.41]] ([[User talk:216.246.232.41|talk]]) 00:18, 3 February 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
: It was added by [[User:Ohconfucius]] ( [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scholarism&diff=627524096&oldid=623849333] ), so only himself knows what he was thinking while adding that description. But I agree, it does looks a bit like a questionable choice, out of so many more possible objective descriptions, the one used is a a quote from Communist Party sponsored media in an authoritarian country. [[User:International Common Editor|International Common Editor]] ([[User talk:International Common Editor|talk]]) 22:44, 12 March 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:44, 12 March 2015
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on July 5 2012. The result of the discussion was delete. |
Please add
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Hong Kong Start‑class | ||||||||||||||
|
Weasel quotes
"Scholarism is considered "extremist" -- Putting that in quotes suggests bias. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.246.232.41 (talk) 00:18, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- It was added by User:Ohconfucius ( [1] ), so only himself knows what he was thinking while adding that description. But I agree, it does looks a bit like a questionable choice, out of so many more possible objective descriptions, the one used is a a quote from Communist Party sponsored media in an authoritarian country. International Common Editor (talk) 22:44, 12 March 2015 (UTC)