Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edwina Lloyd: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 06:02, 27 March 2015

Edwina Lloyd

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Candidate to office without any other claim to notability Grahame (talk) 23:20, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 23:23, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This candidate for office had a feature article on the front page of a major newspaper and several television news stories about her being a candidate who had a drug charge in her past. This kind of state-wide coverage for a candidate is rare, which is why I felt she was notable when I created the page. AlexinaDuel (talk) 23:33, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I was going to wait until tomorrow since then the election will be over; obviously this !vote is contingent on her losing, which she most likely will. To AlexinaDuel: that is what WP:ONEEVENT is for. Frickeg (talk) 01:06, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No argument from me on the outcome of the election, nor on the one event categorisation. I considered a more appropriate title rather than the name, but got stuck. "Edwina Lloyd Labor Candidate With A Prior Cocaine Charge" didn't seem right. These are editing questions from my perspective and not deletion ones. AlexinaDuel (talk) 06:00, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Australia|list of Australia-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Grahamec|Grahame]] ([[User talk:Grahamec|talk]]) 23:23, 26 March 2015 (UTC)</small>
-::*'''Keep'''. This candidate for office had a feature article on the front page of a major newspaper and several television news stories about her being a candidate who had a drug charge in her past. This kind of state-wide coverage for a candidate is rare, which is why I felt she was notable when I created the page. [[User:AlexinaDuel|AlexinaDuel]] ([[User talk:AlexinaDuel|talk]]) 23:33, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
+*'''Keep'''. This candidate for office had a feature article on the front page of a major newspaper and several television news stories about her being a candidate who had a drug charge in her past. This kind of state-wide coverage for a candidate is rare, which is why I felt she was notable when I created the page. [[User:AlexinaDuel|AlexinaDuel]] ([[User talk:AlexinaDuel|talk]]) 23:33, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Politicians|list of Politicians-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:38, 27 March 2015 (UTC)</small>
 *'''Delete'''. I was going to wait until tomorrow since then the election will be over; obviously this !vote is contingent on her losing, which she most likely will. To AlexinaDuel: that is what [[WP:ONEEVENT]] is for. [[User:Frickeg|Frickeg]] ([[User talk:Frickeg|talk]]) 01:06, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
+::No argument from me on the outcome of the election, nor on the one event categorisation. I considered a more appropriate title rather than the name, but got stuck. "Edwina Lloyd Labor Candidate With A Prior Cocaine Charge" didn't seem right. These are editing questions from my perspective and not deletion ones. [[User:AlexinaDuel|AlexinaDuel]] ([[User talk:AlexinaDuel|talk]]) 06:00, 27 March 2015 (UTC)