Talk:HBO Now: Difference between revisions
Added my two cents |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Jargon that is totally unnecessary to the content of the article.[[User:Daqu|Daqu]] ([[User talk:Daqu|talk]]) 13:03, 20 March 2015 (UTC) |
Jargon that is totally unnecessary to the content of the article.[[User:Daqu|Daqu]] ([[User talk:Daqu|talk]]) 13:03, 20 March 2015 (UTC) |
||
:You say "jargon" yet do not provide specific examples. <span style="border:1px solid #f57900;padding:1px;"><font style="color:#8f5902">[[User:ViperSnake151|ViperSnake151]]</font> [[User_talk:ViperSnake151|<font style="color:#fff;background:#fcaf3e;"> Talk </font>]] </span> 15:42, 20 March 2015 (UTC) |
:You say "jargon" yet do not provide specific examples. <span style="border:1px solid #f57900;padding:1px;"><font style="color:#8f5902">[[User:ViperSnake151|ViperSnake151]]</font> [[User_talk:ViperSnake151|<font style="color:#fff;background:#fcaf3e;"> Talk </font>]] </span> 15:42, 20 March 2015 (UTC) |
||
== More about nuts-and-bolts == |
|||
This is a very well-written article, and I appreciate very much the work of the various authors. Still, as an example, I came to this page to find out if HBO Now on the desktop requires Flash. (It does. Version 17 or higher.) And I did not find the answer on this page. So, I guess I agree that the page could be made more helpful for the average person interested in HBO Now, such as the system requirements. You'd think HBO would be better about providing this sort of thing, but it's amazing how often Wikipedia does a better job of presenting useful information about products and services than do the web sites of the companies selling those products and services! |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/100.36.25.14|100.36.25.14]] ([[User talk:100.36.25.14|talk]]) 02:09, 12 April 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:10, 12 April 2015
Article is filled with jargon. It stinks.
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a trade magazine.
This article needs to be entirely rewritten for the ordinary reader to remove the huge quantities of jargon that appear in the article.
Jargon that is totally unnecessary to the content of the article.Daqu (talk) 13:03, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- You say "jargon" yet do not provide specific examples. ViperSnake151 Talk 15:42, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
More about nuts-and-bolts
This is a very well-written article, and I appreciate very much the work of the various authors. Still, as an example, I came to this page to find out if HBO Now on the desktop requires Flash. (It does. Version 17 or higher.) And I did not find the answer on this page. So, I guess I agree that the page could be made more helpful for the average person interested in HBO Now, such as the system requirements. You'd think HBO would be better about providing this sort of thing, but it's amazing how often Wikipedia does a better job of presenting useful information about products and services than do the web sites of the companies selling those products and services!